The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium–Graphite Paste: An Interface Compatible Anode for Solid‐State Batteries
Abstract
All‐solid‐state batteries (ASSBs) with ceramic‐based solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs) enable high safety that is inaccessible with conventional lithium‐ion batteries. Lithium metal, the ultimate anode with the highest specific capacity, also becomes available with nonflammable SSEs in ASSBs, which offers promising energy density. The rapid development of ASSBs, however, is significantly hampered by the large interfacial resistance as a matched lithium/ceramic interface that is not easy to pursue. Here, a lithium–graphite (Li–C) composite anode is fabricated, which shows a dramatic modification in wettability with garnet SSE. An intimate Li–C/garnet interface is obtained by casting Li–C composite onto garnet‐type SSE, delivering an interfacial resistance as low as 11 Ω cm 2. As a comparison, pure Li/garnet interface gives a large resistance of 381 Ω cm 2. Such improvement can be ascribed to the experiment‐measured increased viscosity of Li–C composite and simulation‐verified limited interfacial reaction. The Li–C/garnet/Li–C symmetric cell exhibits stable plating/striping performance with small voltage hysteresis and endures a critical current density up to 1.0 mA cm−2. The full cell paired with LiFePO 4 shows stable cycle performance, comparable to the cell with liquid electrolyte. The present work demonstrates a promising strategy to develop ceramic‐compatible lithium metal‐based anodes and hence low‐impedance ASSBs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Cited by
Physicochemical Concepts of the Lithium Metal Anode in Solid-State Batteries
Krauskopf, T., Richter, F. H., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00431 · Cited by 892
Samson, A. J., Hofstetter, K., Bag, S., & Thangadurai, V. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee01548e · Cited by 502
Reducing the thickness of solid-state electrolyte membranes for high-energy lithium batteries
Wu, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, W., Li, Z., Xie, X., & Huang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d0ee02241a · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Duan, J., Wu, W., Nolan, A. M., Wang, T., Wen, J., Hu, C., Mo, Y., Luo, W., & Huang, Y.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-01-21
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e1807243-e1807243
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2910644063
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.