The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Manipulating the Mixed‐Perovskite Crystallization Pathway Unveiled by In Situ GIWAXS
Abstract
Mixed perovskites have achieved substantial successes in boosting solar cell efficiency, but the complicated perovskite crystal formation pathway remains mysterious. Here, the detailed crystallization process of mixed perovskites (FA 0.83 MA 0.17 Pb(I 0.83 Br 0.17)3) during spin‐coating is revealed by in situ grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering measurements, and three phase‐formation stages are identified: I) precursor solution; II) hexagonal δ‐phase (2H); and III) complex phases including hexagonal polytypes (4H, 6H), MAI–PbI 2–DMSO intermediate phases, and perovskite α‐phase. The correlated device performance and ex situ characterizations suggest the existence of an “annealing window” covering the duration of stage II. The spin‐coated film should be annealed within the annealing window to avoid the formation of hexagonal polytypes during the perovskite crystallization process, thus achieving a good device performance. Remarkably, the crystallization pathway can be manipulated by incorporating Cs+ ions in mixed perovskites. Combined with density functional theory calculations, the perovskite system with sufficient Cs+ will bypass the formation of secondary phases in stage III by promoting the formation of α‐phase both kinetically and thermodynamically, thereby significantly extending the annealing window. This study provides underlying reasons of the time sensitivity of fabricating mixed‐perovskite devices and insightful guidelines for manipulating the perovskite crystallization pathways toward higher performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells
Jeon, N. J., Noh, J. H., Kim, Y. C., Yang, W. S., Ryu, S., & Seok, S. I. (2014) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4014 · Cited by 6,723
Cited by
Highly efficient p-i-n perovskite solar cells that endure temperature variations
Li, G., Su, Z., Canil, L., Hughes, D., Aldamasy, M. H., Dagar, J., Trofimov, S., Wang, L., Zuo, W., Jerónimo-Rendon, J. J., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.add7331 · Cited by 572
Self-citationAcceleration of radiative recombination for efficient perovskite LEDs
Li, M., Yang, Y., Kuang, Z., Hao, C., Wang, S., Lu, F., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Zeng, L., Cai, Y., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07460-7 · Cited by 404
Li, M., Sun, R., Chang, J., Dong, J., Tian, Q., Wang, H., Li, Z., Yang, P., Shi, H., Yang, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36224-6 · Cited by 369
High-efficiency and thermally stable FACsPbI3 perovskite photovoltaics
Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, J., Wang, D., Ding, Z., Zhu, T., Chen, B., Yang, Y., Wei, M., Guo, R., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08103-7 · Cited by 361
Self-citationHui, W., Yang, Y., Xu, Q., Gu, H., Feng, S., Su, Z., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Li, X., Fang, J., et al. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201906374 · Cited by 316
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, M., Tse, K., Lau, T., Li, Y., Su, C., Yang, G., Chen, J., Zhu, J., Jeng, U., Li, G., Chen, H., & Lu, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04-30
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- e1901284-e1901284
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W2943291506
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manipulating the Mixed‐Perovskite Crystallization Pathway Unveiled by In Situ GIWAXS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.201901284
- The paper
- Qin, M., Tse, K., Lau, T., Li, Y., Su, C., Yang, G., Chen, J., Zhu, J., Jeng, U., Li, G., Chen, H., & Lu, X. (2019). Manipulating the Mixed‐Perovskite Crystallization Pathway Unveiled by In Situ GIWAXS. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.