Cited by 269Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsLuminescence and Fluorescent Materials

Multiplexed NIR‐II Probes for Lymph Node‐Invaded Cancer Detection and Imaging‐Guided Surgery

Tian, Rui, Ma, Huilong, Zhu, Shoujun, Lau, Joseph, Ma, Rui, Liu, Yijing, Lin, Lisen, Chandra, Swati +10 more·2020·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Tumor‐lymph node (LN) metastasis is the dominant prognostic factor for tumor staging and therapeutic decision‐making. However, concurrently visualizing metastasis and performing imaging‐guided lymph node surgery is challenging. Here, a multiplexed‐near‐infrared‐II (NIR‐II) in vivo imaging system using nonoverlapping NIR‐II probes with markedly suppressed photon scattering and zero‐autofluorescence is reported, which enables visualization of the metastatic tumor and the tumor metastatic proximal LNs resection. A bright and tumor‐seeking donor–acceptor–donor (D‐A‐D) dye, IR‐FD, is screened for primary/metastatic tumor imaging in the NIR‐IIa (1100–1300 nm) window. This optimized D‐A‐D dye exhibits greatly improved quantum yield of organic D‐A‐D fluorophores in aqueous solutions (≈6.0%) and good in vivo performance. Ultrabright PbS/CdS core/shell quantum dots (QDs) with dense polymer coating are used to visualize cancer‐invaded sentinel LNs in the NIR‐IIb (>1500 nm) window. Compared to clinically used indocyanine green, the QDs show superior brightness and photostability (no obvious bleaching even after continuous laser irradiation for 5 h); thus, only a picomolar dose is required for sentinel LNs detection. This combination of dual‐NIR‐II image‐guided surgery can be performed under bright light, adding to its convenience and appeal in clinical use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.201907365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 269

Authors
Tian, R., Ma, H., Zhu, S., Lau, J., Ma, R., Liu, Y., Lin, L., Chandra, S., Wang, S., Zhu, X., Deng, H., Niu, G., Zhang, M., Antaris, A. L., Hettie, K. S., Yang, B., Liang, Y., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Jilin University (CN)
  • Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
  • Intuitive Surgical (United States) (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zhu, Shoujun
  • Zhang, Mingxi
  • Liang, Yongye
  • Chen, Xiaoyuan
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
e1907365-e1907365
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W3004798929
Cited by
269
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 13
FWCI
20.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21772084)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
Keywords
NIR-II imaging, sentinel lymph node mapping, PbS/CdS core/shell quantum dots, quantum yield enhancement, photostability, tumor staging
MeSH terms
Sentinel Lymph Node, Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Lead, Lymphatic Metastasis, Polymers, Selenium Compounds, Cadmium Compounds, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Surgery, Computer-Assisted, Quantum Dots, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Optical Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review