Cited by 242CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

High‐Entropy Alloy Aerogels: A New Platform for Carbon Dioxide Reduction

Li, Hanjun, Huang, Honggang, Chen, Yao, Lai, Feili, Fu, Hui, Zhang, Longsheng, Zhang, Nan, Bai, Shuxing +1 more·2023·Advanced Materials

Abstract

High‐entropy alloy aerogels (HEAAs) combined with the advantages of high‐entropy alloys and aerogels are prospective new platforms in catalytic reactions. However, due to the differences in reduction potentials and miscibility behavior of different metals, the realization of HEAAs with a single phase is still a great challenge. Herein, a series of HEAAs is fabricated via the freeze–thaw method as highly active and durable electrocatalysts for the carbon dioxide reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). Especially, the PdCuAuAgBiIn HEAAs can achieve Faradaic efficiency (FE) of C1 products almost 100% from −0.7 to −1.1 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (V RHE), and a maximum FE for formic acid (FE HCOOH) of 98.1% at −1.1 V RHE, outperforming PdCuAuAgBiIn high‐entropy alloy particles (HEAPs) and Pd metallic aerogels (MAs). Specifically, the current density and FE HCOOH are almost 200 mA cm−2 and 87% in a flow cell. The impressive CO 2 RR performance of the PdCuAuAgBiIn HEAAs is attributed to the strong interactions between the different metals and the surface unsaturated sites, which can regulate the electronic structures of different metals and allow the optimal HCOO* intermediate adsorption and desorption onto the catalysts surface to enhance HCOOH production. The work not only provides a facile synthetic strategy to fabricate HEAAs, but also opens the avenue for development of efficient catalysts and beyond.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202209242

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 242

Authors
Li, H., Huang, H., Chen, Y., Lai, F., Fu, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, N., Bai, S., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhang, Nan
  • Bai, Shuxing
  • Liu, Tianxi
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-20
Volume
35
Issue
2
Pages
e2209242-e2209242
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4308909401
Cited by
242
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 37
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (22105087, 52161135302)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210446)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
carbon dioxide reduction, electrocatalysis, formate production, Faradaic efficiency, metal-metal interaction, flow cell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review