The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Engineering the Electronic Structure of Single‐Atom Iron Sites with Boosted Oxygen Bifunctional Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries
Abstract
Rechargeable zinc–air batteries typically require efficient, durable, and inexpensive bifunctional electrocatalysts to support oxygen reduction/evolution reactions (ORR/OER). However, sluggish kinetics and mass transportation challenges must be addressed if the performance of these catalysts is to be enhanced. Herein, a strategy to fabricate a catalyst comprising atomically dispersed iron atoms supported on a mesoporous nitrogen‐doped carbon support (Fe SAs/NC) with accessible metal sites and optimized electronic metal–support interactions is developed. Both the experimental results and theoretical calculations reveal that the engineered electronic structures of the metal active sites can regulate the charge distribution of Fe centers to optimize the adsorption/desorption of oxygenated intermediates. The Fe SAs/NC containing Fe 1 N 4 O 1 sites achieves remarkable ORR activity over the entire pH range, with half‐wave potentials of 0.93, 0.83, and 0.75 V (vs reversible hydrogen electrode) in alkaline, acidic, and neutral electrolytes, respectively. In addition, it demonstrates a promising low overpotential of 320 mV at 10 mA cm−2 for OER in alkaline conditions. The zinc–air battery assembled with Fe SAs/NC exhibits superior performance than that of Pt/C+RuO 2 counterpart in terms of peak power density, specific capacity, and cycling stability. These findings demonstrate the importance of the electronic structure engineering of metal sites in directing catalytic activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells
Debe, M. K. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11115 · Cited by 5,885
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts
Zhang, B., Zheng, X., Voznyy, O., Comin, R., Bajdich, M., García-Melchor, M., Han, L., Xu, J., Liu, M., Zheng, L., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1525 · Cited by 2,447
Exploring Durable Single-Atom Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
Wan, X., & Shui, J. (2022) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00473 · Cited by 128
Cited by
Zn-based batteries for sustainable energy storage: strategies and mechanisms
Tang, L., Peng, H., Kang, J., Chen, H., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., Kim, D. H., Liu, Y., & Lin, Z. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00295k · Cited by 548
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Z., Ji, S., Xu, C., Leng, L., Liu, H., Horton, J. H., Du, L., Gao, J., He, C., Qi, X., Xu, Q., & Zhu, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2022-12-29
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- e2209644-e2209644
- ISSN
- 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-4095
- OpenAlex
- W4311884485
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering the Electronic Structure of Single‐Atom Iron Sites with Boosted Oxygen Bifunctional Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202209644
- The paper
- Li, Z., Ji, S., Xu, C., Leng, L., Liu, H., Horton, J. H., Du, L., Gao, J., He, C., Qi, X., Xu, Q., & Zhu, J. (2023). Engineering the Electronic Structure of Single‐Atom Iron Sites with Boosted Oxygen Bifunctional Activity for Zinc–Air Batteries. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202209644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.