Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Harnessing High‐Throughput Computational Methods to Accelerate the Discovery of Optimal Proton Conductors for High‐Performance and Durable Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells

Luo, Zheyu, Hu, Xueyu, Zhou, Yucun, Ding, Yong, Zhang, Weilin, Li, Tongtong, Liu, Meilin·2024·Advanced Materials

Abstract

The pursuit of high‐performance and long‐lasting protonic ceramic electrochemical cells (PCECs) is impeded by the lack of efficient and enduring proton conductors. Conventional research approaches, predominantly based on a trial‐and‐error methodology, have proven to be demanding of resources and time‐consuming. Here, this work reports the findings in harnessing high‐throughput computational methods to expedite the discovery of optimal electrolytes for PCECs. This work methodically computes the oxygen vacancy formation energy (E V ), hydration energy (E H ), and the adsorption energies of H 2 O and CO 2 for a set of 932 oxide candidates. Notably, these findings highlight BaSn x Ce 0.8‐x Yb 0.2 O 3‐δ (BSCYb) as a prospective game‐changing contender, displaying superior proton conductivity and chemical resilience when compared to the well‐regarded BaZr x Ce 0.8‐x Y 0.1 Yb 0.1 O 3‐δ (BZCYYb) series. Experimental validations substantiate the computational predictions; PCECs incorporating BSCYb as the electrolyte achieved extraordinary peak power densities in the fuel cell mode (0.52 and 1.57 W cm −2 at 450 and 600 °C, respectively), a current density of 2.62 A cm −2 at 1.3 V and 600 °C in the electrolysis mode while demonstrating exceptional durability for over 1000‐h when exposed to 50% H 2 O. This research underscores the transformative potential of high‐throughput computational techniques in advancing the field of proton‐conducting oxides for sustainable power generation and hydrogen production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202311159

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Choi S., 2019, Environ. Sci., 12, 206
  2. Luo Z. Y., 2022, Environ Sci, 15, 2992
  3. Kim J. H., 2021, Environ Sci, 14, 1506
  4. Choi M., 2021, Environ Sci, 14, 6476

Metadata

Authors
Luo, Z., Hu, X., Zhou, Y., Ding, Y., Zhang, W., Li, T., & Liu, M.
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-01-28
Volume
36
Issue
18
ISSN
  • 0935-9648
  • 1521-4095
Cited by
59
References
62
Language
en
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Fossil Energy (DE‐FE0032115)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harnessing High‐Throughput Computational Methods to Accelerate the Discovery of Optimal Proton Conductors for High‐Performance and Durable Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adma.202311159
The paper
Luo, Z., Hu, X., Zhou, Y., Ding, Y., Zhang, W., Li, T., & Liu, M. (2024). Harnessing High‐Throughput Computational Methods to Accelerate the Discovery of Optimal Proton Conductors for High‐Performance and Durable Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells. Advanced Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202311159

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.