Cited by 40Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsNanomaterials for catalytic reactions

Crystal‐Phase‐Engineered High‐Entropy Alloy Aerogels for Enhanced Ethylamine Electrosynthesis from Acetonitrile

Huang, Honggang, Chen, Cun, Chang, Chun‐Chi, Lai, Feili, Liu, Shangheng, Fu, Hui, Chen, Yao, Li, Hanjun +3 more·2024·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Crystal‐phase engineering that promotes the rearrangement of active atoms to form new structural frameworks achieves excellent result in the field of electrocatalysis and optimizes the performance of various electrochemical reactions. Herein, for the first time, it is found that the different components in metallic aerogels will affect the crystal‐phase transformation, especially in high‐entropy alloy aerogels (HEAAs), whose crystal‐phase transformation during annealing is more difficult than medium‐entropy alloy aerogels (MEAAs), but they still show better electrochemical performance. Specifically, PdPtCuCoNi HEAAs with the parent phase of face‐centered cubic (FCC) PdCu possess excellent 89.24% of selectivity, 746.82 mmol h −1 g −1 cat. of yield rate, and 90.75% of Faraday efficiency for ethylamine during acetonitrile reduction reaction (ARR); while, maintaining stability under 50 h of long‐term testing and ten consecutive electrolysis cycles. The structure–activity relationship indicates that crystal‐phase regulation from amorphous state to FCC phase promotes the atomic rearrangement in HEAAs, thereby optimizing the electronic structure and enhancing the adsorption strength of reaction intermediates, improving the catalytic performance. This study provides a new paradigm for developing novel ARR electrocatalysts and also expands the potential of crystal‐phase engineering in other application areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202314142

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 40

Authors
Huang, H., Chen, C., Chang, C., Lai, F., Liu, S., Fu, H., Chen, Y., Li, H., Huang, W., Zhang, N., & Liu, T.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Wei‐Hsiang
  • Zhang, Nan
  • Liu, Tianxi
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-04-23
Volume
36
Issue
26
Pages
e2314142-e2314142
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4394834907
Cited by
40
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52161135302, 52211530489, 22105087)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20210446)
  • Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2022M721360)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
Keywords
crystal phase engineering, annealing, electrocatalysis, structure-activity relationship, Faradaic efficiency, intermediate adsorption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review