Cited by 143Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Metallic Ru─Ru Interaction in Ruthenium Oxide Enabling Durable Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis

Zhao, Guoqiang, Guo, Wei, Shan, Minmin, Fang, Yanyan, Wang, Gongming, Gao, Mingxia, Liu, Yongfeng, Pan, Hongge +1 more·2024·Advanced Materials

Abstract

Developing efficient and robust electrocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is critical for proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE). RuO 2 possesses intrinsically high OER activity, but the concurrent electrochemical dissolution leads to rapid deactivation. Here a unique RuO 2 catalyst containing metallic Ru─Ru interactions (m-RuO 2 ) is reported, which maintains stability in practical PEMWE for 100 h at 60 °C and 1 A cm -2 . Experimental and theoretical investigations suggest that the presence of Ru─Ru interactions significantly increases the energy barrier for the formation of RuO 2 (OH) 2 , which is a key intermediate for Ru dissolution, and hence substantially mitigates the electrochemical corrosion of m-RuO 2 . Meanwhile, the Ru4d band center downshifts, accordingly, ensuring the high OER activity, and the participation of lattice oxygen in the OER is also suppressed at the Ru─Ru sites, further contributing to the enhanced durability. Interestingly, such enhanced stability is also dependent on the size of metallic Ru─Ru cluster, where the energy barrier is further increased for Ru 3 , but is decreased for Ru 5 . These results highlight the significance of local coordination structure modulation on the electrochemical stability of RuO 2 and open a feasible avenue toward the development of robust OER electrocatalysts for high-performance PEMWE.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adma.202404213

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, G., Guo, W., Shan, M., Fang, Y., Wang, G., Gao, M., Liu, Y., Pan, H., & Sun, W.
Affiliations
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Xi'an Technological University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Wenping
Venue
Advanced Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-05-09
Volume
36
Issue
30
Pages
e2404213-e2404213
ISSN
  • 0935-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-4095
OpenAlex
W4396583076
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 19
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advanced Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (92261119, 52171224, 52301293)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ22B030006, LQ22B030005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
ruthenium oxide, RuO2, oxygen evolution reaction, proton exchange membrane water electrolysis, electrocatalyst durability, electrochemical dissolution, cluster size effects, local coordination structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review