The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Janus Separator of Polypropylene‐Supported Cellular Graphene Framework for Sulfur Cathodes with High Utilization in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Owing to the conversion chemistry of the sulfur cathode, the lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries exhibit high theoretical energy density. However, the intrinsic mobile redox centers during the sulfur/Li 2 S‐to‐lithium polysulfides solid‐to‐liquid phase transition induce low sulfur utilization and poor cycling life. Herein, the Janus separator of mesoporous cellular graphene framework (CGF)/polypropylene membrane to promote the utilization of sulfur cathode is introduced. The porous polypropylene membrane serves as an insulating substrate in contact with lithium anode while CGFs that possess high electrical conductivity of 100 S cm−1, a large mesopore volume of 3.1 cm 3 g−1, and a huge surface area of 2120 m 2 g−1 are adhered on cathode side to reactivate the shuttling‐back polysulfides and to preserve the ion channels. Therefore, the Li–S cell with the “two‐face” CGF Janus separator exhibit a high initial capacity of 1109 mAh g−1 and superior capacity preserved upon 800 mAh g−1 after 250 cycles at 0.2 C, which is 40% higher on sulfur utilization efficiency than the corresponding results with routine polypropylene separators. There are significant improvements on capacity as well as electrochemical kinetics. A very high areal capacity of 5.5 mAh cm−2 combined with high sulfur content of 80% and areal loading amount of 5.3 mg cm−2 is achieved for such advanced configuration. The negative impact of shuttle mechanism on lowering the utilization of sulfur and overall energy density of a Li–S battery is well eliminated by applying CGF separators. Consequently, employing carbonaceous materials as Janus face of separators enlightens new opportunities for improving the utilization of active materials and energy density of devices that involve complex phase evolution and conversion electrochemistry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
Self-citationHuang, J.-Q., Zhang, Q., & Wei, F. (2015) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2015.09.008 · Cited by 665
Self-citationAdvanced Micro/Nanostructures for Lithium Metal Anodes
Zhang, R., Li, N., Cheng, X., Yin, Y., Zhang, Q., & Guo, Y. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600445 · Cited by 549
Self-citationChai, J., Liu, Z., Ma, J., Wang, J., Liu, X., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Cui, G., & Chen, L. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600377 · Cited by 538
Dendrite-Free Li-Metal Battery Enabled by a Thin Asymmetric Solid Electrolyte with Engineered Layers
Duan, H., Yin, Y.-X., Shi, Y., Wang, P.-F., Zhang, X.-D., Yang, C.-P., Shi, J.-L., Wen, R., Guo, Y.-G., & Wan, L.-J. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.7b10864 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, H., Wang, D., Huang, J., Cheng, X., Yuan, Z., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q.
- Venue
- Advanced Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1500268-1500268
- ISSN
- 2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122640167
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Janus Separator of Polypropylene‐Supported Cellular Graphene Framework for Sulfur Cathodes with High Utilization in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/advs.201500268
- The paper
- Peng, H., Wang, D., Huang, J., Cheng, X., Yuan, Z., Wei, F., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Janus Separator of Polypropylene‐Supported Cellular Graphene Framework for Sulfur Cathodes with High Utilization in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201500268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.