Spin‐State Engineering of Iron Phthalocyanine D‐Orbitals via Atomic Fe‐N 4 Coupling for Enhanced Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Open accessAbstract
Since the properties of electron transfer and orbital interactions in oxygen electrocatalysts are highly spin‐dependent, reaction kinetics and thermodynamics are very sensitive to the spin configuration. However, understanding the spin‐related origin of catalytic activity in heterogeneous molecular electrocatalysts still remains challenging. Herein, a molecular‐atomic coupled catalyst is constructed by integrating iron phthalocyanine (FePc) molecules with Fe‐N 4 atomic sites anchored on nitrogen‐doped carbon nanotubes (FePc‐Fe‐NCNT). The strong electronic coupling between FePc and the Fe‐N 4 ‐containing carbon substrate triggers a transition of the Fe sites from a low‐spin state to an intermediate‐spin state. Additionally, the formation of σ* bonds between the electron‐injected perpendicular d z2 orbitals of intermediate‐spin Fe and the 2p orbitals of adsorbed oxygen species suppresses site blocking and accelerates OH* desorption, thereby enhancing the reaction kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The resulting catalyst exhibits exceptional ORR activity in alkaline media, reaching a half‐wave potential of 0.89 V and negligible degradation after 10,000 cycles. Remarkably, the quasi‐solid‐state Zinc‐air battery based on this prepared catalyst operates stably from −40 to 70 °C with minimal performance loss. This work reveals a spin‐state manipulation strategy for the development of advanced molecular catalysts and provides new insights into the regulation of electronic structure for energy conversion technologies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Lv, Z., Shu, Z., Qiu, Y., Luo, J., Xu, K., Ma, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, H., & Mao, Z.
- Affiliations
- Donghua University (CN)
- University of Macau (MO)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Mao, Zhiping
- Venue
- Advanced Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-07-18
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- e10306-e10306
- ISSN
- 2198-3844 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12499505
- OpenAlex
- W4412491450
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 3
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Advanced Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (2021ZDPT03)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Keywords
- iron phthalocyanine, oxygen reduction reaction, spin-state engineering, Fe-N4 active sites, nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes, OH desorption, alkaline electrocatalysis, zinc-air batteries, low-temperature electrocatalysis, catalyst stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review