The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Abstract
Lithium (Li)‐ion batteries (LIB) have governed the current worldwide rechargeable battery market due to their outstanding energy and power capability. In particular, the LIB's role in enabling electric vehicles (EVs) has been highlighted to replace the current oil‐driven vehicles in order to reduce the usage of oil resources and generation of CO 2 gases. Unlike Li, sodium is one of the more abundant elements on Earth and exhibits similar chemical properties to Li, indicating that Na chemistry could be applied to a similar battery system. In the 1970s‐80s, both Na‐ion and Li‐ion electrodes were investigated, but the higher energy density of Li‐ion cells made them more applicable to small, portable electronic devices, and research efforts for rechargeable batteries have been mainly concentrated on LIB since then. Recently, research interest in Na‐ion batteries (NIB) has been resurrected, driven by new applications with requirements different from those in portable electronics, and to address the concern on Li abundance. In this article, both negative and positive electrode materials in NIB are briefly reviewed. While the voltage is generally lower and the volume change upon Na removal or insertion is larger for Na‐intercalation electrodes, compared to their Li equivalents, the power capability can vary depending on the crystal structures. It is concluded that cost‐effective NIB can partially replace LIB, but requires further investigation and improvement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Rational design of layered oxide materials for sodium-ion batteries
Zhao, C., Wang, Q., Yao, Z., Wang, J., Sánchez-Lengeling, B., Ding, F., Qi, X., Lu, Y., Bai, X., Li, B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay9972 · Cited by 1,540
Sun, M.-H., Huang, S.-Z., Chen, L.-H., Li, Y., Yang, X.-Y., Yuan, Z.-Y., & Su, B.-L. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00135a · Cited by 1,454
A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries
Han, M. H., Gonzalo, E., Singh, G., & Rojo, T. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03192j · Cited by 1,380
Sodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
An Amorphous Red Phosphorus/Carbon Composite as a Promising Anode Material for Sodium Ion Batteries
Kim, Y., Park, Y., Choi, A., Choi, N., Kim, J., Lee, J., Ryu, J. H., Oh, S. M., & Lee, K. T. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201204877 · Cited by 854
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S., Seo, D., Ma, X., Ceder, G., & Kang, K.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-05-14
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 710-721
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2115010843
- Cited by
- 3,370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 127.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium‐Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201200026
- The paper
- Kim, S., Seo, D., Ma, X., Ceder, G., & Kang, K. (2012). Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Potential Alternatives to Current Lithium‐Ion Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201200026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.