Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Toward the Theoretical Capacitance of RuO2 Reinforced by Highly Conductive Nanoporous Gold

Chen, L. Y., Hou, Y., Kang, J. L., Hirata, A., Fujita, T., Chen, M. W.·2013·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

The experimental specific capacitance of ruthenium oxide (RuO2) is usually much smaller than the theoretical value due to low electron–proton transport and high rate dependence. Highly conductive nanoporous gold (NPG) can dramatically improve the capacitive performance of RuO2 when RuO2 is electroplated into NPG. The RuO2@NPG electrodes provide fast ionic conduction and excellent electron–proton transport for low rate dependence and high charge storage of around 1500 F g−1, close to the theoretical value of RuO2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201300024

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L. Y., Hou, Y., Kang, J. L., Hirata, A., Fujita, T., & Chen, M. W.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03-08
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
851-856
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W1968715472
Cited by
211
References
0
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward the Theoretical Capacitance of RuO2 Reinforced by Highly Conductive Nanoporous Gold. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201300024
The paper
Chen, L. Y., Hou, Y., Kang, J. L., Hirata, A., Fujita, T., & Chen, M. W. (2013). Toward the Theoretical Capacitance of RuO2 Reinforced by Highly Conductive Nanoporous Gold. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300024

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.