The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coated Lithium Powder (CLiP) Electrodes for Lithium‐Metal Batteries
Abstract
Safety issues caused by the metallic lithium inside a battery represent one of the main reasons for the lack of commercial availability of rechargeable lithium‐metal batteries. The advantage of anodes based on coated lithium powder (CLiP), compared to plain lithium foil, include the suppression of dendrite formation, as the local current density during stripping/plating is reduced due to the higher surface area. Another performance and safety advantage of lithium powder is the precisely controlled mass loading of the lithium anode during electrode preparation, giving the opportunity to avoid Li excess in the cell. As an additional benefit, the coating makes electrode manufacturing safer and eases handling. Here, electrodes based on coated lithium powder electrodes (CLiP) are introduced for application in lithium‐metal batteries. These electrodes are compared to lithium foil electrodes with respect to cycling stability, coulombic efficiency of lithium stripping/plating, overpotential, and morphology changes during cycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Recent developments in lithium ion batteries
Wakihara, M. (2001) · Materials Science and Engineering R Reports · doi:10.1016/s0927-796x(01)00030-4 · Cited by 719
Cited by
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries
Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T., & Winter, M. (2018) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-018-0107-2 · Cited by 3,233
Self-citationReview on High‐Loading and High‐Energy Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Peng, H., Huang, J., Cheng, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700260 · Cited by 1,746
3D Porous Cu Current Collector/Li‐Metal Composite Anode for Stable Lithium‐Metal Batteries
Li, Q., Zhu, S., & Lu, Y. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201606422 · Cited by 854
Lithium Metal Anodes with Nonaqueous Electrolytes
Zhang, J.-G., Xu, W., Xiao, J., Cao, X., & Liu, J. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00275 · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Heine, J., Krüger, S., Hartnig, C., Wietelmann, U., Winter, M., & Bieker, P.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-18
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2115203588
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coated Lithium Powder (CLiP) Electrodes for Lithium‐Metal Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201300815
- The paper
- Heine, J., Krüger, S., Hartnig, C., Wietelmann, U., Winter, M., & Bieker, P. (2014). Coated Lithium Powder (CLiP) Electrodes for Lithium‐Metal Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201300815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
