The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling the Active Sites of Sulfur‐Doped Carbon Nanotube–Graphene Nanolobes for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution and Reduction Catalysis
Open accessAbstract
Controlling active sites of metal‐free catalysts is an important strategy to enhance activity of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Many attempts have been made to develop metal‐free catalysts, but the lack of understanding of active‐sites at the atomic‐level has slowed the design of highly active and stable metal‐free catalysts. A sequential two‐step strategy to dope sulfur into carbon nanotube–graphene nanolobes is developed. This bidoping strategy introduces stable sulfur–carbon active‐sites. Fluorescence emission of the sulfur K‐edge by X‐ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES) and scanning transmission electron microscopy electron energy loss spectroscopy (STEM‐EELS) mapping and spectra confirm that increasing the incorporation of heterocyclic sulfur into the carbon ring of CNTs not only enhances OER activity with an overpotential of 350 mV at a current density of 10 mA cm−2, but also retains 100% of stability after 75 h. The bidoped sulfur carbon nanotube–graphene nanolobes behave like the state‐of‐the‐art catalysts for OER but outperform those systems in terms of turnover frequency (TOF) which is two orders of magnitude greater than (20% Ir/C) at 400 mV overpotential with very high mass activity 1000 mA cm−2 at 570 mV. Moreover, the sulfur bidoping strategy shows high catalytic activity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Stable bifunctional (ORR and OER) catalysts are low cost, and light‐weight bidoped sulfur carbon nanotubes are potential candidates for next‐generation metal‐free regenerative fuel cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, D., Xin, H. L., Hovden, R., Wang, H., Yu, Y., Muller, D. A., DiSalvo, F. J., & Abruña, H. D. (2013) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3458 · Cited by 2,082
Tang, J., Liu, J., Li, C., Li, Y., Tade, M. O., Dai, S., & Yamauchi, Y. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201407629 · Cited by 630
Cited by
Huang, Z., Wang, J., Peng, Y., Jung, C., Fisher, A., & Wang, X. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201700544 · Cited by 835
Nonprecious Metal Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction in Heterogeneous Aqueous Systems
Gewirth, A. A., Varnell, J. A., & DiAscro, A. M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00335 · Cited by 773
Wang, H., Tang, C., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201803329 · Cited by 772
Defects on carbons for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction
Yan, X., Jia, Y., & Yao, X. (2018) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00690j · Cited by 593
Zeng, X., Shui, J., Liu, X., Liu, Q., Li, Y., Shang, J., Zheng, L., & Yu, R. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201701345 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- El‐Sawy, A. M., Mosa, I. M., Su, D., Guild, C. J., Khalid, S., Joesten, R., Rusling, J. F., & Suib, S. L.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-12-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2185137198
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controlling the Active Sites of Sulfur‐Doped Carbon Nanotube–Graphene Nanolobes for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution and Reduction Catalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201501966
- The paper
- El‐Sawy, A. M., Mosa, I. M., Su, D., Guild, C. J., Khalid, S., Joesten, R., Rusling, J. F., & Suib, S. L. (2016). Controlling the Active Sites of Sulfur‐Doped Carbon Nanotube–Graphene Nanolobes for Highly Efficient Oxygen Evolution and Reduction Catalysis. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501966
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.