The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries
Abstract
Benefiting from the high abundance and low cost of sodium resource, rechargeable sodium‐ion batteries (SIBs) are regarded as promising candidates for large‐scale electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Due to the heavier mass and larger radius of Na+ than that of Li+, SIBs with inorganic electrode materials are currently plagued with low capacity and insufficient cycling life. In comparison, organic electrode materials display the advantages of structure designability, high capacity and low limitation of cationic radius. However, organic electrode materials also encounter issues such as high‐solubility in electrolyte and low conductivity. Here, recently reported organic electrode materials, which mainly include the reactions based on either carbon‐oxygen double bond or carbon‐nitrogen double bond, and doping reactions, are systematically reviewed. Furthermore, the design strategies of organic electrodes are comprehensively summarized. The working voltage is regulated through controlling the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energies. The theoretical capacity can be enhanced by increasing the active groups. The dissolution is inhibited with elevating the intermolecular forces with proper molecular weight. The conductivity can be improved with extending conjugated structures. Future research into organic electrodes should focus on the development of full SIBs with aqueous/aprotic electrolytes and long cycling stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Opportunities and Challenges for Organic Electrodes in Electrochemical Energy Storage
Poizot, P., Gaubicher, J., Renault, S., Dubois, L., Liang, Y., & Yao, Y. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00482 · Cited by 963
Covalent–Organic Frameworks: Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Batteries
Sun, T., Xie, J., Guo, W., Li, D., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201904199 · Cited by 622
Exploring competitive features of stationary sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage
Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Z., Zeng, X., Ji, J., Li, Z., Gao, X., Sun, M., Lin, Z., Ling, M., et al. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03727b · Cited by 592
Redox-Active Polymers for Energy Storage Nanoarchitectonics
Kim, J., Kim, J. H., & Ariga, K. (2017) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.018 · Cited by 549
Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects of Calcium Batteries
Arroyo-de Dompablo, M. E., Ponrouch, A., Johansson, P., & Palacín, M. R. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00339 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., & Chen, J.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2562345775
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201601792
- The paper
- Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., & Chen, J. (2017). Advanced Organic Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Sodium‐Ion Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.