The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoporous CaCO3 Coatings Enabled Uniform Zn Stripping/Plating for Long‐Life Zinc Rechargeable Aqueous Batteries
Abstract
Zn‐based batteries are safe, low cost, and environmentally friendly, as well as delivering the highest energy density of all aqueous battery systems. However, the application of Zn‐based batteries is being seriously hindered by the uneven electrostripping/electroplating of Zn on the anodes, which always leads to enlarged polarization (capacity fading) or even cell shorting (low cycling stability). How a porous nano‐CaCO 3 coating can guide uniform and position‐selected Zn stripping/plating on the nano‐CaCO 3‐layer/Zn foil interfaces is reported here. This Zn‐deposition‐guiding ability is mainly ascribed to the porous nature of the nano‐CaCO 3‐layer, since similar functionality (even though relatively inferior) is also found in Zn foils coated with porous acetylene black or nano‐SiO 2 layers. Furthermore, the potential application of this strategy is demonstrated in Zn|ZnSO 4+MnSO 4|CNT/MnO 2 rechargeable aqueous batteries. Compared with the ones with bare Zn anodes, the battery with a nano‐CaCO 3‐coated Zn anode delivers a 42.7% higher discharge capacity (177 vs 124 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1) after 1000 cycles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reviving the lithium metal anode for high-energy batteries
Lin, D., Liu, Y., & Cui, Y. (2017) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2017.16 · Cited by 6,763
Cited by
An Overview and Future Perspectives of Rechargeable Zinc Batteries
Shi, Y., Chen, Y., Shi, L., Wang, K., Wang, B., Li, L., Ma, Y., Li, Y., Sun, Z., Ali, W., et al. (2020) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202000730 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, L., Cui, M., Jiang, F., Gao, Y., Luo, H., Liu, J., Liang, W., & Zhi, C.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-07-17
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 25
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W2883511429
- Cited by
- 1,245
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
