Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dopant‐Dependent Stability of Garnet Solid Electrolyte Interfaces with Lithium Metal

Open access
Zhu, Yisi, Connell, Justin G., Tepavcevic, Sanja, Zapol, Peter, Garcia‐Mendez, Regina, Taylor, Nathan J., Sakamoto, Jeff, Ingram, Brian J., Curtiss, Larry A., Freeland, John W., Fong, Dillon D., Markovic, Nenad M.·2019·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) garnet‐based materials doped with Al, Nb, or Ta to stabilize the Li+‐conductive cubic phase are a particularly promising class of solid electrolytes for all‐solid‐state lithium metal batteries. Understanding of the intrinsic reactivity between solid electrolytes and relevant electrode materials is crucial to developing high voltage solid‐state batteries with long lifetimes. Using a novel, surface science‐based approach to characterize the intrinsic reactivity of the Li–solid electrolyte interface, it is determined that, surprisingly, some degree of Zr reduction takes place for all three dopant types, with the extent of reduction increasing as Ta < Nb < Al. Significant reduction of Nb also takes place for Nb‐doped LLZO, with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of Li||Nb–LLZO||Li symmetric cells further revealing significant increases in impedance with time and suggesting that the Nb reduction propagates into the bulk. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that Nb‐doped material shows a strong preference for Nb dopants toward the interface between LLZO and Li, while Ta does not exhibit a similar preference. EIS and DFT results, coupled with the observed reduction of Zr at the interface, are consistent with the formation of an “oxygen‐deficient interphase” (ODI) layer whose structure determines the stability of the LLZO–Li interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.201803440

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 323

Metadata

Authors
Zhu, Y., Connell, J. G., Tepavcevic, S., Zapol, P., Garcia‐Mendez, R., Taylor, N. J., Sakamoto, J., Ingram, B. J., Curtiss, L. A., Freeland, J. W., Fong, D. D., & Markovic, N. M.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-10
Volume
9
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W2913909639
Cited by
323
References
36
FWCI
14.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dopant‐Dependent Stability of Garnet Solid Electrolyte Interfaces with Lithium Metal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.201803440
The paper
Zhu, Y., Connell, J. G., Tepavcevic, S., Zapol, P., Garcia‐Mendez, R., Taylor, N. J., Sakamoto, J., Ingram, B. J., Curtiss, L. A., Freeland, J. W., Fong, D. D., & Markovic, N. M. (2019). Dopant‐Dependent Stability of Garnet Solid Electrolyte Interfaces with Lithium Metal. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201803440

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.