The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porous Transport Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Under Extreme Conditions of Current Density, Temperature, and Pressure
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogen produced via water electrolysis powered by renewable electricity or green H 2 offers new decarbonization pathways. Proton exchange membrane water electrolysis (PEMWE) is a promising technology although the current density, temperature, and H 2 pressure of the PEMWE will have to be increased substantially to curtail the cost of green H 2. Here, a porous transport layer for PEMWE is reported, that enables operation at up to 6 A cm−2, 90 °C, and 90 bar H 2 output pressure. It consists of a Ti porous sintered layer (PSL) on a low‐cost Ti mesh (PSL/mesh‐PTL) by diffusion bonding. This novel approach does not require a flow field in the bipolar plate. When using the mesh‐PTL without PSL, the cell potential increases significantly due to mass transport losses reaching ca. 2.5 V at 2 A cm−2 and 90 °C. On the other hand, the PEMWE with the PSL/mesh‐PTL has the same cell potential but at 6 A cm−2, thus increasing substantially the operation range of the electrolyzer. Extensive physical characterization and pore network simulation demonstrate that the PSL/mesh‐PTL leads to efficient gas/water management in the PEMWE. Finally, the PSL/mesh‐PTL is validated in an industrial size PEMWE in a container operating at 90 bar H 2 output pressure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buttler, A., & Spliethoff, H. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,510
Cited by
Stability of electrocatalytic OER: from principle to application
Li, H., Lin, Y., Duan, J., Wen, Q., Liu, Y., & Zhai, T. (2024) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00010a · Cited by 540
Wan, L., Xu, Z., Xu, Q., Pang, M., Lin, D., Liu, J., & Wang, B. (2023) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee00142c · Cited by 371
Gas Evolution in Water Electrolysis
Kempler, P. A., Coridan, R. H., & Luo, L. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00211 · Cited by 289
Bubble Engineering on Micro-/Nanostructured Electrodes for Water Splitting
Li, M., Xie, P., Yu, L., Luo, L., & Sun, X. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c08831 · Cited by 286
Akay, Ö., Bashkatov, A., Coy, E., Eckert, K., Einarsrud, K. E., Friedrich, A., Kimmel, B., Loos, S., Mutschke, G., Röntzsch, L., et al. (2022) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-022-00239-y · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Stiber, S., Balzer, H., Wierhake, A., Wirkert, F. J., Roth, J., Rost, U., Brodmann, M., Lee, J. K., Bazylak, A., Waiblinger, W., Gago, A. S., & Friedrich, K. A.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-07-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 33
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W3178047631
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porous Transport Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Under Extreme Conditions of Current Density, Temperature, and Pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202100630
- The paper
- Stiber, S., Balzer, H., Wierhake, A., Wirkert, F. J., Roth, J., Rost, U., Brodmann, M., Lee, J. K., Bazylak, A., Waiblinger, W., Gago, A. S., & Friedrich, K. A. (2021). Porous Transport Layers for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Under Extreme Conditions of Current Density, Temperature, and Pressure. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.