Cited by 202Advanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery MaterialsBattery Modeling and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ion‐Dipole Chemistry Drives Rapid Evolution of Li Ions Solvation Sheath in Low‐Temperature Li Batteries

Abstract

Sluggish evolution of lithium ions’ solvation sheath induces large charge‐transfer barriers and high ion diffusion barriers through the passivation layer, resulting in undesirable lithium dendrite formation and capacity loss of lithium batteries, especially at low temperatures. Here, an ion‐dipole strategy by regulating the fluorination degree of solvating agents is proposed to accelerate the evolution of the Li + solvation sheath. Ethylene carbonate (EC)‐based fluorinated derivatives, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) and di‐fluoro ethylene carbonate (DFEC) are used as the solvating agents for a high dielectric constant. As the increase of the fluorination degree from EC to FEC and DFEC, the Li + ‐dipole interaction strength gradually decreases from 1.90 to 1.66 and 1.44 eV, respectively. Consequently, the DFEC‐based electrolyte displays six times faster ion desolvation rate than that of a non‐fluorinated EC‐based electrolyte at −20 °C. Furthermore, LiNi 0.8 Co 0.1 Mn 0.1 O 2 ||lithium cells in a DFEC‐based electrolyte retain 91% original capacity after 300 cycles at 25 °C, and 51% room‐temperature capacity at −30 °C. By bridging the gap between the ion‐dipole interactions and the evolution of Li + solvation sheath, this work provides a new technique toward rational design of electrolyte engineering for low‐temperature lithium batteries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.202100935

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02190 · DOI
  2. 10.1039/C9CC07092C · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.04.010 · DOI
  4. 10.1039/D0CS01017K · DOI
  5. 10.1002/aenm.201903645 · DOI
  6. 10.1002/anie.201911724 · DOI
  7. 10.1039/C8TA10513H · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.103 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/acsaem.0c01605 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/aenm.201900704 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/acsami.7b13887 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/batt.201800118 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/jz400661k · DOI
  14. 10.1002/aenm.201903843 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/anie.201801513 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/anie.201807034 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/aenm.202000567 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/adma.202001740 · DOI
  19. 10.1002/anie.201914250 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/ncomms2513 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.10.017 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41560-019-0474-3 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1002/anie.201901381 · DOI
  24. 10.1039/C5EE01215E · DOI
  25. 10.1021/cr030203g · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.027 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/anie.202003663 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41560-020-0634-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/adfm.201906548 · DOI
  30. 10.1021/jacs.7b06834 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/s41565-018-0183-2 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/adma.201707629 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/adfm.202001285 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/adma.202004793 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/adma.202005763 · DOI
  36. Ma J., 2020, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 60, 6600
  37. 10.1002/anie.202012005 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/anie.201903466 · DOI
  39. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02398 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.10.021 · DOI
  41. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz3112 · DOI
  42. 10.1002/adma.201605531 · DOI
  43. 10.1149/1.1457985 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227073 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/adfm.202002578 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1021/ct900009a · DOI
  48. 10.1093/nar/gkx312 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/jcc.22885 · DOI
  50. 10.1002/jcc.21224 · DOI
  51. 10.1002/bdd.780 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–167 of 167

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Z., Sun, Z., Shi, Y., Qi, F., Gao, X., Yang, H., Cheng, H., & Li, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Sun, Zhenhua
  • Li, Feng
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-28
Volume
11
Issue
28
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W3172441039
Cited by
202
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 5
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Energy Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Tsinghua University
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52020105010, 51927803, 51972313, 51525206, 52072378)
  • Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1908015)
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y201942)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
Keywords
ion-dipole interactions, fluoroethylene carbonate, ethylene carbonate, electrolyte engineering, ion desolvation, lithium dendrite suppression, capacity retention, LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review