The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries
Abstract
Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) applied to battery research is considered to be a powerful tool for accelerating the research cycle. However, the development of appropriate materials descriptors is often the first hurdle toward implementing meaningful and accurate AI/ML. Currently, rational solvent selection remains a significant challenge in electrolyte development and is still based on experiments. The dielectric constant (ε) and donor number (DN) in electrolyte design are insufficient. Finding theoretically computable solvent descriptors for evaluating Li+ solvation is a significant step toward accelerating electrolyte development. Here, based on the electrostatic interaction between Li+ and solvent, the electrostatic potential (ESP) of electrolyte solvent is calculated by density functional theory calculations and reveals significant regularity. ESP as a direct and simple solvent descriptor for conveniently designing electrolytes is proposed. The lowest negative electrostatic potential (ESP min) ensures the nucleophilic capacity of the solvating solvent and the weak ESP min means decreased solvation energy. Weak ESP min and strong highest positive electrostatic potential (ESP max) are the main characteristics of non‐solvating antisolvents. Using the plot of ESP min – ESP max strong solvating solvent, weakly solvating solvent, or antisolvent are identified that have been used in electrolyte engineering. This solvent descriptor can boost AI/ML to develop high performance electrolytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer
Lu, T., & Chen, F. (2012) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.22885 · Cited by 45,371
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
Solvents and Solvent Effects in Organic Chemistry
Reichardt, C. (2002) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527601791 · Cited by 5,789
Electrolytes and Interphases in Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Xu, K. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500003w · Cited by 5,566
Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries
Xu, W., Wang, J., Ding, F., Chen, X., Nasybulin, E., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J.-G. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee40795k · Cited by 4,704
Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes
Manthiram, A., Yu, X., & Wang, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 · Cited by 4,689
Winter, M., Barnett, B., & Xu, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00422 · Cited by 2,193
Structural Changes in Silicon Anodes during Lithium Insertion/Extraction
Obrovac, M. N., & Christensen, L. (2004) · Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters · doi:10.1149/1.1652421 · Cited by 1,995
The electrostatic potential: an overview
Murray, J. S., & Politzer, P. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.19 · Cited by 1,823
Yamada, Y., Furukawa, K., Sodeyama, K., Kikuchi, K., Yaegashi, M., Tateyama, Y., & Yamada, A. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja412807w · Cited by 1,525
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Hu, Q., Liang, H., Wang, A., Xu, H., Wang, L., & He, X.
- Venue
- Advanced Energy Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-04-14
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 22
- ISSN
- 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-6840
- OpenAlex
- W4365814859
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202300259
- The paper
- Wu, Y., Hu, Q., Liang, H., Wang, A., Xu, H., Wang, L., & He, X. (2023). Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.