Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries

Wu, Yanzhou, Hu, Qiao, Liang, Hongmei, Wang, Aiping, Xu, Hong, Wang, Li, He, Xiangming·2023·Advanced Energy Materials

Abstract

Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) applied to battery research is considered to be a powerful tool for accelerating the research cycle. However, the development of appropriate materials descriptors is often the first hurdle toward implementing meaningful and accurate AI/ML. Currently, rational solvent selection remains a significant challenge in electrolyte development and is still based on experiments. The dielectric constant (ε) and donor number (DN) in electrolyte design are insufficient. Finding theoretically computable solvent descriptors for evaluating Li+ solvation is a significant step toward accelerating electrolyte development. Here, based on the electrostatic interaction between Li+ and solvent, the electrostatic potential (ESP) of electrolyte solvent is calculated by density functional theory calculations and reveals significant regularity. ESP as a direct and simple solvent descriptor for conveniently designing electrolytes is proposed. The lowest negative electrostatic potential (ESP min) ensures the nucleophilic capacity of the solvating solvent and the weak ESP min means decreased solvation energy. Weak ESP min and strong highest positive electrostatic potential (ESP max) are the main characteristics of non‐solvating antisolvents. Using the plot of ESP min – ESP max strong solvating solvent, weakly solvating solvent, or antisolvent are identified that have been used in electrolyte engineering. This solvent descriptor can boost AI/ML to develop high performance electrolytes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aenm.202300259

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Hu, Q., Liang, H., Wang, A., Xu, H., Wang, L., & He, X.
Venue
Advanced Energy Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-04-14
Volume
13
Issue
22
ISSN
  • 1614-6832 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-6840
OpenAlex
W4365814859
Cited by
270
References
53
FWCI
19.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aenm.202300259
The paper
Wu, Y., Hu, Q., Liang, H., Wang, A., Xu, H., Wang, L., & He, X. (2023). Electrostatic Potential as Solvent Descriptor to Enable Rational Electrolyte Design for Lithium Batteries. Advanced Energy Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.