Improving physician well‐being and reducing burnout using a peer‐to‐peer recognition program
Open accessAbstract
Background: Drivers of physician burnout include an intricate interplay between health care organizational structures, societal influences, and individual‐level factors. In the traditional workforce, peer‐to‐peer recognition programs (PRPs) have reduced burnout by building a sense of community and effectively creating a “wellness culture.” We implemented a PRP in an emergency medicine (EM) residency and determined its impact on subjective symptoms of burnout and wellness. Methods: This was a prospective, pre‐ and postintervention study conducted in a single residency over a 6‐month period. All 84 EM residents of the program were sent a voluntary anonymized survey that included a validated instrument on wellness and burnout. A PRP was initiated. After 6 months, a second survey was distributed. The outcome of the study was to examine whether the addition of a PRP reduced burnout and improved wellness. Results: There were 84 respondents to the pre‐PRP survey and 72 to the post‐PRP survey. Respondents reported an improvement after the inception of the use of the PRP in two factors that contribute to a physician's wellness: feeling recognized for accomplishments at work, which improved from 45% (38/84) affirmative to 63% (45/72; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3%–32.4%, p = 0.025) and a comfortable and supportive work environment, which improved from 68% (57/84) to 85% (61/72; 95% CI 3.5%–29.3%, p = 0.014). There was no significant effect in the Stanford Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI) as a result of this intervention over the 6 months. Conclusions: A PRP initiative resulted in improvements in several factors that drive physician wellness but overall burnout measured by the Stanford PFI did not show any improvement over the 6‐month period. A future longitudinal study examining the continuous assessment of PRP on the EM residents throughout the entire course of 4 years of residency training would be beneficial to determine if it could change burnout from year to year.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Interventions that fostered collegiality or respect through daily team huddles or formal recognition programs were unlikely to be effective.
“interventions that fostered collegiality or respect through daily team huddles13 or formal recognition programs were unlikely to be effective.14-17”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
There is no consistent evidence that implementing peer support through daily care team huddles, grief support, or employee recognition programs reduced burnout.
“we found no consistent evidence that implementing peer support through daily care team huddles, grief support, or employee recognition programs reduced burnout.10-12,14,15,25”
From What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think (2026) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Bruschwein, H., & Gettle, L. S. (2020) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001015 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do we really know about addressing burnout among healthcare workers? Maybe less than we think
Goetzel, R. Z., Fazen, L. E., Kent, K. B., Roemer, E. C., & Saldanha, I. J. (2026) · Health affairs scholar · doi:10.1093/haschl/qxag041
- Authors
- Chang, J., Saggar, V., Cortijo‐Brown, A., Friedman, B. W., Jones, M., Li‐Sauerwine, S., Rebillot, K., & Corbo, J.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Jenny
- Venue
- AEM Education and Training
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e10861-e10861
- ISSN
- 2472-5390 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10041070
- OpenAlex
- W4361010308
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 4.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- AEM Education and Training (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- physician burnout, physician well-being, emergency medicine residency, employee recognition, supportive work environment, residency training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review