The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Low‐flow limit in slot coating: Theory and experiments
Abstract
The region of acceptable quality in the space of operating parameters of a coating process is called coating window. Their limits are set by coating defects. For the slot‐coating process the low‐flow limit is important. It corresponds to the maximum web speed at a given film thickness, or the minimum film thickness at a given web speed, at which the coating bead remains stable. The available viscocapillary model is based on the Landau‐Levich equation, which is limited to small Capillary and Reynolds numbers. Under these conditions, the minimum film thickness that can be coated decreases with decreasing coating speed, but many coating processes do not occur at low Capillary numbers. It is important to determine the range of validity of the viscocapillary model and find the low‐flow limit outside this range. The low‐flow limit was determined here theoretically and experimentally. The 2‐D Navier‐Stokes equations with free surfaces describe liquid flow in the coating bead. Theoretical approaches solve the Navier‐Stokes system by either using Galerkin's method with finite‐element basis functions or applying a long‐wave expansion. The minimum layer thickness at a set of parameters was determined by the turning point on the solution path as the thickness was diminished. The minimum film thickness was measured experimentally by determining the flow rate at which the coating bead breaks, leading to stripes of coated and uncoated web. Results show that the low‐flow limit of the coating bead at large Capillary and Reynolds numbers fundamentally differs from that at their low numbers. At large Capillary and Reynolds numbers, the minimum film thickness that can be coated decreases with increasing coating speed. The coating window of the process is much larger than that in the literature, broadening the applicability of this coating method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kraytsberg, A., & Ein‐Eli, Y. (2016) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201600655 · Cited by 299
Roll-to-Roll Coating Technology and Its Applications: A Review
Park, J., Shin, K., & Lee, C. (2016) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s12541-016-0067-z · Cited by 140
Creel, E. B., Tjiptowidjojo, K., Alex Lee, J., Livingston, K. M., Randall Schunk, P., Bell, N. S., Serov, A., & Wood III, D. L. (2022) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.11.047 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Carvalho, M. S., & Kheshgi, H. S.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1907-1917
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2128410286
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐flow limit in slot coating: Theory and experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.690461003
- The paper
- Carvalho, M. S., & Kheshgi, H. S. (2000). Low‐flow limit in slot coating: Theory and experiments. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690461003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.