The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High‐resolution adsorption isotherms of supercritical carbon dioxide on activated carbon
Abstract
Supercritical fluids are attractive solvents for heterogeneous processes, including catalysis and adsorptive separation. However, adsorption processes in the near‐critical region are poorly understood and exhibit unique behavior where the adsorption of the supercritical solvent plays an important role in the solute adsorption. The behavior of supercritical fluids in confined pores has been studied theoretically, but there are few experimental data on their behavior in industrially important microporous materials. The adsorption of carbon dioxide on Calgon F400 activated carbon over a wide range of pressures (0–20 MPa) at temperatures near the critical point of carbon dioxide (30 to 45°C) was studied. Near‐continuous adsorption and desorption isotherms were measured with a new flow gravimetric apparatus with precise control over pressure and temperature. As pressure is increased, the excess adsorption increases sharply at low pressures; then a broad maximum is observed. At temperatures greater than the critical temperature, there is a sharp drop in excess adsorption near the critical region where the density of the bulk fluid increases sharply. A crossover is observed near the critical region where, below a certain pressure, the excess adsorption decreases with temperature, while above the crossover point the trend is reversed. When analyzed as a function of solvent density, the crossover disappears, revealing an anomalous maximum in total adsorption near the critical point similar to the enhanced local density or “charisma” observed in binary solute–supercritical fluid systems. A 2‐D EOS model using the 2‐D Peng‐Robinson EOS was able to qualitatively describe the adsorption behavior over the entire pressure range, but the quantitative agreement was poor in the near‐critical region.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Span, R., & Wagner, W. (1996) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555991 · Cited by 5,049
Cited by
Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in Coal with Enhanced Coalbed Methane RecoveryA Review
White, C. M., Smith, D. H., Jones, K. L., Goodman, A. L., Jikich, S. A., LaCount, R. B., DuBose, S. B., Ozdemir, E., Morsi, B. I., & Schroeder, K. T. (2005) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef040047w · Cited by 1,018
A review of experimental research on Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM) recovery via CO2 sequestration
Mukherjee, M., & Misra, S. (2018) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.02.018 · Cited by 339
Sudibandriyo, M., Pan, Z., Fitzgerald, J. E., Robinson, R. L., & Gasem, K. A. M. (2003) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la020976k · Cited by 317
Liu, F., Ellett, K., Xiao, Y., & Rupp, J. A. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.018 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Humayun, R., & Tomasko, D. L.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2065-2075
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2036330291
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High‐resolution adsorption isotherms of supercritical carbon dioxide on activated carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.690461017
- The paper
- Humayun, R., & Tomasko, D. L. (2000). High‐resolution adsorption isotherms of supercritical carbon dioxide on activated carbon. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690461017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.