The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disturbance models for offset‐free model‐predictive control
Abstract
Model predictive control algorithms achieve offset‐free control objectives by adding integrating disturbances to the process model. The purpose of these additional disturbances is to lump the plant‐model mismatch and/or unmodeled disturbances. Its effectiveness has been proven for particular square cases only. For systems with a number of measured variables (p) greater than the number of manipulated variables (m), it is clear that any controller can track without offset at most m controlled variables. One may think that m integrating disturbances are sufficient to guarantee offset‐free control in the m controlled variables. We show this idea is incorrect and present general conditions that allow zero steady‐state offset. In particular, a number of integrating disturbances equal to the number of measured variables are shown to be sufficient to guarantee zero offset in the controlled variables. These results apply to square and nonsquare, open‐loop stable, integrating and unstable systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Direct Voltage Control of DC–DC Boost Converters Using Enumeration-Based Model Predictive Control
Karamanakos, P., Geyer, T., & Manias, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2013.2256370 · Cited by 295
Impact of the controller model complexity on model predictive control performance for buildings
Picard, D., Drgoňa, J., Kvasnica, M., & Helsen, L. (2017) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.027 · Cited by 97
Kumar, P., Rawlings, J. B., Wenzel, M. J., & Risbeck, M. J. (2023) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.112936 · Cited by 30
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pannocchia, G., & Rawlings, J. B.
- Venue
- AIChE Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 426-437
- ISSN
- 0001-1541 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-5905
- OpenAlex
- W2005151817
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disturbance models for offset‐free model‐predictive control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/aic.690490213
- The paper
- Pannocchia, G., & Rawlings, J. B. (2003). Disturbance models for offset‐free model‐predictive control. AIChE Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490213
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.