Cited by 43Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies

Toward Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Materials Discovery

Open access
Mikulskis, Paulius, Alexander, Morgan R., Winkler, David Alan·2019·Advanced Intelligent Systems

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) methods for modeling useful materials properties are now important technologies for rational design and optimization of bespoke functional materials. Although these methods make good predictions of the properties of new materials, current modeling methods use efficient but rather arcane (difficult‐to‐interpret) mathematical features (descriptors) to characterize materials. Data‐driven ML models are considerably more useful if more chemically interpretable descriptors are used to train them, as long as these models also accurately recapitulate the properties of materials in training and test sets used to generate and validate the models. Herein, how a particular type of molecular fragment descriptor, the signature descriptor, achieves these joint aims of accuracy and interpretability is described. Seven different types of materials properties are modeled, and the performance of models generated from signature descriptors is compared with those generated by widely used Dragon descriptors. The key descriptors in the model represent functionalities that make chemical sense. Mapping these fragments back on to exemplar materials provides a useful guide to chemists wishing to modify promising lead materials to improve their properties. This is one of the first applications of signature descriptors to the modeling of complex materials properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aisy.201900045

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 43

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. T. Le, V. C. Epa, F. R. Burden, D. A. Winkler, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2889.
  2. T. Fujita, D. A. Winkler, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 269.
  3. J. E. Gubernatis, T. Lookman, Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 120301;
  4. Y. Liu, T. Zhao, W. Ju, S. Shi, J. Mater. 2017, 3, 159;
  5. J. Schmidt, M. R. G. Marques, S. Botti, M. A. L. Marques, Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 83.
  6. J. S. Ma, R. P. Sheridan, A. Liaw, G. E. Dahl, V. Svetnik, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2015, 55, 263.
  7. A. W. Thornton, C. M. Simon, J. Kim, O. Kwon, K. S. Deeg, K. Konstas, S. J. Pas, M. R. Hill, D. A. Winkler, M. Haranczyk, B. Smit, Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 2844.
  8. P. Mikulskis, A. L. Hook, M. H. Alexander, D. A. Winkler, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 139.
  9. D. A. Winkler, M. Breedon, P. White, A. E. Hughes, E. D. Sapper, I. Cole, Corros. Sci. 2016, 106, 229.
  10. C. Y. Shao, S. Z. Chen, B. H. Su, Y. J. Tseng, E. X. Esposito, A. J. Hopfinger, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 142;
  11. A. Cherkasov, E. N. Muratov, D. Fourches, A. Varnek, I. I. Baskin, M. Cronin, J. Dearden, P. Gramatica, Y. C. Martin, R. Todeschini, V. Consonni, V. E. Kuz'min, R. Cramer, R. Benigni, C. Yang, J. Rathman, L. Terfloth, J. Gasteiger, A. Richard, A. Tropsha, J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 4977.
  12. A. Mauri, V. Consonni, M. Pavan, R. Todeschini, Match 2006, 56, 237.
  13. P. Polishchuk, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017, 57, 2618.
  14. C. J. Churchwell, M. D. Rintoul, S. Martin, D. P. Visco, A. Kotu, R. S. Larson, L. O. Sillerud, D. C. Brown, J. L. Faulon, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2004, 22, 263;
  15. J. L. Faulon, C. J. Churchwell, D. P. Visco, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2003, 43, 721;
  16. J. L. Faulon, D. P. Visco, R. S. Pophale, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2003, 43, 707.
  17. P. Carbonell, L. Carlsson, J. L. Faulon, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2013, 53, 887.
  18. D. S. Chekmarev, V. Kholodovych, K. V. Balakin, Y. Ivanenkov, S. Ekins, W. J. Welsh, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 1304;
  19. J. J. F. Chen, D. P. Visco, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2017, 159, 31;
  20. J. D. Jackson, D. C. Weis, D. P. Visco, Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2008, 72, 540;
  21. D. C. Weis, D. P. Visco, Comput. Chem. Eng. 2010, 34, 1018;
  22. D. C. Weis, D. P. Visco, J. L. Faulon, J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2008, 27, 466.
  23. W. M. Brown, S. Martin, M. D. Rintoul, J. L. Faulon, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 826.
  24. J. S. Delaney, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2004, 44, 1000.
  25. A. L. Hook, C. Y. Chang, J. Yang, J. Luckett, A. Cockayne, S. Atkinson, Y. Mei, R. Bayston, D. J. Irvine, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, P. Williams, M. C. Davies, M. R. Alexander, Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 868.
  26. V. C. Epa, A. L. Hook, C. Chang, J. Yang, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, P. Williams, M. C. Davies, M. R. Alexander, D. A. Winkler, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2085;
  27. V. C. Epa, J. Yang, Y. Mei, A. L. Hook, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, M. C. Davies, M. R. Alexander, D. A. Winkler, J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 20902;
  28. P. M. Khan, K. Roy, SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2018, 29, 935;
  29. A. Afantitis, G. Melagraki, H. Sarimveis, P. A. Koutentis, J. Markopoulos, O. Igglessi-Markopoulou, Polymer 2006, 47, 3240.
  30. N. Jain, S. H. Yalkowsky, J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 90, 234.
  31. A. J. Urquhart, M. Taylor, D. G. Anderson, R. Langer, M. C. Davies, M. R. Alexander, Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 135.
  32. M. Salahinejad, T. C. Le, D. A. Winkler, Mol. Pharm. 2013, 10, 2757.
  33. F. R. Burden, D. A. Winkler, QSAR Comb. Sci. 2009, 28, 645.
  34. O. Isayev, C. Oses, C. Toher, E. Gossett, S. Curtarolo, A. Tropsha, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 15679.
  35. A. L. Hook, C. Y. Chang, J. Yang, S. Atkinson, R. Langer, D. G. Anderson, M. C. Davies, P. Williams, M. R. Alexander, Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2542.
  36. J. L. Faulon, M. J. Collins, R. D. Carr, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci. 2004, 44, 427.
  37. D. A. Winkler, F. R. Burden, Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 224;
  38. R. Tibshirani, J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. B 1996, 58, 267.

Authors
Mikulskis, P., Alexander, M. R., & Winkler, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Winkler, David Alan
Venue
Advanced Intelligent Systems
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-14
Volume
1
Issue
8
ISSN
2640-4567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975965186
Cited by
43
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N006615/1)
  • Wellcome Trust (085245)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Keywords
model interpretability, materials discovery, Dragon descriptors, materials property prediction, rational materials design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review