Cited by 481Medical and Biological SciencesPrimate Behavior and EcologyPoint processes and geometric inequalities

Brain sizes, surfaces, and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebri: A stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupials, insectivores, and one elephant)

Haug, Herbert·1987·American Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

This study deals with the stereological estimation of macroscopic sizes of brain and cortex, i.e., volume, surface, and folding, and of microscopic neuronal sizes, i.e., density, mean size, size distribution, and number of neurons. The results show that the degree of variability in man amounts to about 15%. A decrease in volume of the different gray structures can be observed in man after the age of 65 years. The surface, folding index, and length of convolution do not alter with aging. The comparison with mammals of various sizes allows the conclusion that there is a high correlation to brain size for nearly all macroscopic values. Man and elephant, however, have a cortical surface which is, in comparison with whales, relatively small. In contrast, whales have very small cortices compared with man. At the cytoarchitectonic level, the neuronal density has a correlation to brain size. Contrary to other mammals, the primates and man have a high fraction of small granular neurons, especially in layer 4. The assumption that the number of cortical neurons beneath a given surface area of cortex is the same in all mammals cannot be verified, especially in those with large brains. The allometric connection between brain size and parameters is not valid for all measurements (e.g., thickness of cortex, mean size of neurons, perikaryal size distribution, and glial density). Yet some other measurements are well correlated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aja.1001800203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different mammalian orders have traditionally been pooled in brain allometry studies as if their brains were built according to the same scaling rules.

    “Different mammalian orders have traditionally been pooled together in studies of brain allometry, as if their brains were built according to the same scaling rules (for example, Haug, 1987; Zhang and Sejnowski, 2000).”

    From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Haug, 1987

  • The assumption that brain size relates to number of neurons similarly across orders underlies most comparative studies to date.

    “This assumption, which was justifiable by the lack of direct estimates of the neuronal composition of the brain of different species, is so widespread that it implicitly or explicitly underlies most comparative studies to date (for example, Haug, 1987; Finlay and Darlington, 1995; Barton and Harvey, 2000; Clark et al., 2001).”

    From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Haug, 1987

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 45 · Cited by 481

Authors
Haug, H.
Affiliations
University of Lübeck (DE)
Corresponding author
Haug, Herbert
Venue
American Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1987-10
Volume
180
Issue
2
Pages
126-142
ISSN
  • 0002-9106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-0795
OpenAlex
W1997406173
Cited by
481
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
26.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
Keywords
human brain, cerebral cortex, brain size, cortical surface area, cortical folding, neuronal density, brain aging, allometry, primate brain, marsupial brain, cortical thickness, glial density
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropometry, Cerebral Cortex, Elephants, Humans, Eulipotyphla, Marsupialia, Neurons, Primates, Regression Analysis, Whales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review