Brain sizes, surfaces, and neuronal sizes of the cortex cerebri: A stereological investigation of man and his variability and a comparison with some mammals (primates, whales, marsupials, insectivores, and one elephant)
Abstract
This study deals with the stereological estimation of macroscopic sizes of brain and cortex, i.e., volume, surface, and folding, and of microscopic neuronal sizes, i.e., density, mean size, size distribution, and number of neurons. The results show that the degree of variability in man amounts to about 15%. A decrease in volume of the different gray structures can be observed in man after the age of 65 years. The surface, folding index, and length of convolution do not alter with aging. The comparison with mammals of various sizes allows the conclusion that there is a high correlation to brain size for nearly all macroscopic values. Man and elephant, however, have a cortical surface which is, in comparison with whales, relatively small. In contrast, whales have very small cortices compared with man. At the cytoarchitectonic level, the neuronal density has a correlation to brain size. Contrary to other mammals, the primates and man have a high fraction of small granular neurons, especially in layer 4. The assumption that the number of cortical neurons beneath a given surface area of cortex is the same in all mammals cannot be verified, especially in those with large brains. The allometric connection between brain size and parameters is not valid for all measurements (e.g., thickness of cortex, mean size of neurons, perikaryal size distribution, and glial density). Yet some other measurements are well correlated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Different mammalian orders have traditionally been pooled in brain allometry studies as if their brains were built according to the same scaling rules.
“Different mammalian orders have traditionally been pooled together in studies of brain allometry, as if their brains were built according to the same scaling rules (for example, Haug, 1987; Zhang and Sejnowski, 2000).”
From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Haug, 1987
The assumption that brain size relates to number of neurons similarly across orders underlies most comparative studies to date.
“This assumption, which was justifiable by the lack of direct estimates of the neuronal composition of the brain of different species, is so widespread that it implicitly or explicitly underlies most comparative studies to date (for example, Haug, 1987; Finlay and Darlington, 1995; Barton and Harvey, 2000; Clark et al., 2001).”
From The human brain in numbers: a linearly scaled-up primate brain (2009) · cites this paper as Haug, 1987
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 45 · Cited by 481
- Authors
- Haug, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Lübeck (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Haug, Herbert
- Venue
- American Journal of Anatomy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-10
- Volume
- 180
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-142
- ISSN
- 0002-9106 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-0795
- OpenAlex
- W1997406173
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 26.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Point processes and geometric inequalities
- Keywords
- human brain, cerebral cortex, brain size, cortical surface area, cortical folding, neuronal density, brain aging, allometry, primate brain, marsupial brain, cortical thickness, glial density
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anthropometry, Cerebral Cortex, Elephants, Humans, Eulipotyphla, Marsupialia, Neurons, Primates, Regression Analysis, Whales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review