Cited by 338Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

Morphogenesis of the murine node and notochordal plate

Sulik, K., Dehart, D. B., Inagaki, T., Carson, J. L., Vrablic, T., Gesteland, K., Schoenwolf, G. C.·1994·Developmental Dynamics

Abstract

Development of the node and formation of the notochordal plate in gestational day 7—9 mice (Theiler stages 10—14) has been documented principally with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and cell fate analyses utilizing DiI and/or CFSE as a cell label. With SEM, cells composing these two populations are initially identifiable at stage 10 at the ventral midline of the rostral half of the embryo. They can be recognized by their relatively small ventral surface area, as compared to that of the peripherally adjacent prospective gut endodermal cells, and by the presence on the ventral side of each cell of a prominent single, central cilium, which is lacking on endodermal cells. At stage 10, the node is located at the apex of the cup‐shaped embryo. It represents the rostral end of the primitive streak (although its structure differs from that of the rest of the streak), and it consists of a localized two‐layered area (i.e., epiblast and the most caudal aspect of the notochordal plate). By stage 11, the notochordal plate constitutes a relatively broad, circular area (at the level of the node) that tapers rostrally into a narrower midline strip (beneath the future floor plate of the neural tube). The tip of the notochordal plate terminates rostrally at the much broader prechordal plate, which underlies the future forebrain level of the neuraxis. The prechordal plate cells, like the ventral node and notochordal plate cells, each have a relatively small ventral node ventral surface area and displays a single central cilium on their ventral surface. The most caudal aspect of the notochordal plate remains morphologically distinct on the dorsal, midline surface of the open gut through stage 13; the more rostral levels progressively fold off from the roof of the gut to form the definitive notochord. Videomicroscopy reveals that the cilia extending from the ventral surfaces of the cells of node and of the prechordal and notochordal plates are motile. The potential significance of this motile behavior remains unknown. Labeling studies, which marked cells in both the dorsal and ventral layers of the node, reveal that the stage‐10 node contributes cells to the notochordal plate and overlying midline ectodermal cells of the neural plate, the future floor plate of the neural tube. The results of our labeling studies, in which cells in both layers of the node were marked, when compared with the results of a recent study in which only the ventral layer of the node was marked (Beddington [1994] Development 120:613—620) provide strong evidence that the ventral layer of the node forms notochord, whereas the dorsal layer forms floor plate of the neural tube. A similar origin for these two populations of cells has been suggested for the chick embryo (Selleck and Stern [1991] Development 112:615—626). The morphology of the murine notochordal plate and labeling studies support the concept of origin and rostrocaudal elongation of this structure in large part by accretion of cells from the node. In addition, cell division and cell rearrangement within the notochordal plate play important roles in murine notochord extension (Sausedo and Schoenwolf [1994] Anat. Rec. 239:103—112). © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aja.1002010309

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 41 · Cited by 338

Authors
Sulik, K., Dehart, D. B., Inagaki, T., Carson, J. L., Vrablic, T., Gesteland, K., & Schoenwolf, G. C.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenwolf, G. C.
Venue
Developmental Dynamics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-11
Volume
201
Issue
3
Pages
260-278
ISSN
  • 1058-8388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0177
OpenAlex
W2047837497
Cited by
338
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Dynamics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01hd028845-05)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 28845)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
notochord formation, prechordal plate, primitive streak, ciliary motility, cell fate, floor plate, neural tube, epiblast, cell migration, mouse embryo, gastrulation, cell labeling, cell death, cell proliferation, cell adhesion
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbocyanines, Chick Embryo, Female, Fluoresceins, Fluorescent Dyes, Gastrula, Gestational Age, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Notochord, Pregnancy, Species Specificity, Succinimides, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review