Cited by 144Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Multiple myeloma: 2012 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management

Open access
Rajkumar, S. Vincent·2012·American Journal of Hematology

Abstract

Disease overview: Multiple myeloma accounts for ∼10% of all hematologic malignancies. Diagnosis: The diagnosis requires 10% or more clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of end‐organ damage felt to be related to the underlying plasma‐cell disorder. Risk stratification: Patients with 17p deletion, t(14;16), t(14;20), or high‐risk gene expression profiling signature have high‐risk myeloma. Patients with t(4;14) translocation, karyotypic deletion 13, or hypodiploidy are considered to have intermediate‐risk disease. All others are considered to have standard‐risk myeloma. Risk‐adapted therapy: Standard‐risk patients are treated with nonalkylator‐based therapy such as lenalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) followed by autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT). An alternative strategy is to continue initial therapy after stem‐cell collection, reserving ASCT for first relapse. Intermediate‐risk and high‐risk patients are treated with a bortezomib‐based induction followed by ASCT and then bortezomib‐based maintenance. Patients not eligible for ASCT can be treated with Rd for standard risk disease, or with a bortezomib‐based regimen if intermediate‐risk or high‐risk features are present. To reduce toxicity, when using bortezomib, the once‐weekly subcutaneous dose is preferred; similarly, when using dexamethasone, the low‐dose approach (40 mg once a week) is preferred, unless there is a need for rapid disease control. Management of refractory disease: Patients with indolent relapse can be treated first with two‐drug or three‐drug combinations. Patients with more aggressive relapse often require therapy with a combination of multiple active agents. The most promising new agents in development are pomalidomide and carfilizomib. Am. J. Hematol., 2012. © 2011 Wiley Perodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajh.22237

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • KRd instead of VRd can be used as initial therapy in patients with t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and those with ≥2 high-risk abnormalities based on phase 2 studies suggesting higher complete response rates and minimal residual disease negativity rates compared with historical results using VRd.

    “KRd instead of VRd can be used as initial therapy in patients with t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), and those with ≥2 high-risk abnormalities based on the results of phase 2 studies suggesting higher complete response (CR) rates and minimal residual disease negativity rates compared with historical results using VRd [28,30,31].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with high-risk MM do poorly with conventional treatment options and are encouraged to participate in clinical trials that employ novel therapeutic strategies.

    “Patients with a high risk of MM do poorly with conventional treatment options and are therefore encouraged to participate in clinical trials that employ novel therapeutic strategies.”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Risk-Stratification section reports median overall survival of less than 2–3 years for high-risk patients despite tandem autologous stem-cell transplantation, supporting the poor-outcomes portion of the claim. The paper recommends aggressive treatment for high-risk patients, but the passages reviewed do not encourage them generally to enter clinical trials of novel strategies; its clinical-trial recommendation concerns frontline allogeneic transplantation. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Outside of a clinical trial, VRd remains the preferred choice of initial chemotherapy for patients with high-risk MM who are not candidates for HCT.

    “Outside of a clinical trial, VRd remains the preferred choice of initial chemotherapy for patients with high-risk MM who are not candidates for HCT [28,29].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. [1]Rajkumar SV Treatment of multiple myeloma Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011 8 479 491 21522124 PMC3773461
  2. [2]Rajkumar SV Gahrton G Bergsagel PL Approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma: A clash of philosophies Blood 2011 118 3205 3211 21791430 PMC3179390
  3. [3]Jemal A Siegel R Xu J Ward E Cancer Statistics, 2010 CA Cancer J Clin 2010 60 277 300 20610543
  4. [4]Kyle RA Therneau TM Rajkumar SV Larson DR Plevak MF Melton LJ III Incidence of multiple myeloma in Olmsted County, Minnesota: Trend over 6 decades Cancer 2004 101 2667 2674 15481060
  5. [5]Landgren O Weiss BM Patterns of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma in various ethnic/racial groups: Support for genetic factors in pathogenesis Leukemia 2009 23 1691 1697 19587704
  6. [6]Kyle RA Gertz MA Witzig TE Review of 1,027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Mayo Clinic Proc 2003 78 21 33 12528874
  7. [7]Roodman GD Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease Leukemia 2009 23 435 441 19039321
  8. [8]Short KD Rajkumar SV Larson D Incidence of extramedullary disease in patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel therapy, and the activity of pomalidomide on extramedullary myeloma Leuk: Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund, UK 2011 25 906 908 PMC3736849 21350560
  9. [9]Landgren O Kyle RA Pfeiffer RM Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: A prospective study Blood 2009 113 5412 5417 19179464 PMC2689042
  10. [10]Weiss BM Abadie J Verma P Howard RS Kuehl WM A monoclonal gammopathy precedes multiple myeloma in most patients Blood 2009 113 5418 5422 19234139 PMC2689043
  11. [11]Kyle RA Therneau TM Rajkumar SV A long-term study of prognosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance N Engl J Med 2002 346 564 569 11856795
  12. [13]Kyle RA Remstein ED Therneau TM Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2007 356 2582 2590 17582068
  13. [14]The International Myeloma Working Group Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: A report of the International Myeloma Working Group Br J Haematol 2003 121 749 757 12780789
  14. [15]Rajkumar SV Kyle RA Multiple myeloma: Diagnosis and treatment [see comment] Mayo Clinic Proc 2005 80 1371 1382 16212152
  15. [16]Kyle RA Therneau TM Rajkumar SV Long-term follow-up of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Blood 2003 102 3759 3764 12881316
  16. [17]Gobbi PG Baldini L Broglia C Prognostic validation of the international classification of immunoglobulin M gammopathies: A survival advantage for patients with immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance? Clin Cancer Res 2005 11 1786 1790 15756000
  17. [18]Kyle RA Therneau TM Rajkumar SV Long-term follow-up of IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Semin Oncol 2003 30 169 171 12720130
  18. [19]Baldini L Goldaniga M Guffanti A Immunoglobulin M monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance and indolent Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia recognize the same determinants of evolution into symptomatic lymphoid disorders: Proposal for a common prognostic scoring system J Clin Oncol 2005 23 4662 4668 16034042
  19. [20]Owen RG Treon SP Al-Katib A Clinicopathological definition of Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia: Consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia Semin Oncol 2003 30 110 115 12720118
  20. [21]Dispenzieri A Katzmann JA Kyle RA Prevalence and risk of progression of light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A retrospective population-based cohort study Lancet 2010 375 1721 1728 20472173 PMC2904571
  21. [22]Dimopoulos MA Moulopoulos LA Maniatis A Alexanian R Solitary plasma-cytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma Blood 2000 96 2037 2044 10979944
  22. [23]Dimopoulos MA Kiamouris C Moulopoulos LA Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and extramedullary plasmacytoma Hematol—Oncol Clin N Am 1999 13 1249 1257 10626148
  23. [24]Rajkumar SV Dispenzieri A Kyle RA Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, AL amyloidosis, and related plasma cell disorders: Diagnosis and treatment Mayo Clinic Proc 2006 81 693 703 16706268
  24. [25]Dispenzieri A Kyle RA Lacy MQ POEMS syndrome: Definitions and long-term outcome Blood 2003 101 2496 2506 12456500
  25. [26]Dispenzieri A POEMS syndrome Blood Rev 2007 21 285 299 17850941
  26. [27]Kyle RA Rajkumar SV Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma Leukemia 2009 23 3 9 18971951 PMC2627786
  27. [28]Katzmann JA Dispenzieri A Kyle R Elimination of the need for urine studies in the screening algorithm for monoclonal gammopathies by using serum immunofixation and free light chain assays Mayo Clin Proc 2006 81 1575 1578 17165636
  28. [29]Kumar SK Mikhael JR Buadi FK Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: Updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) Consensus Guidelines Mayo Clinic Proc 2009 84 1095 1110 PMC2787395 19955246
  29. [30]Zhou Y Barlogie B Shaughnessy JD Jr The molecular characterization and clinical management of multiple myeloma in the post-genome era Leukemia 2009 23 1941 1956 19657360 PMC3686133
  30. [31]Dizdar O Barista I Kalyoncu U Biochemical markers of bone turnover in diagnosis of myeloma bone disease Am J Hematol 2007 82 185 191 17022050
  31. [32]Silvestris F Lombardi L De Matteo M Bruno A Dammacco F Myeloma bone disease: Pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical assessment Leuk Res 2007 31 129 138 16764925
  32. [33]Dimopoulos M Terpos E Comenzo RL International myeloma working group consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma Leukemia 2009 23 1545 1556 19421229
  33. [35]Durie BGM Harousseau J-L Miguel JS International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma Leukemia 2006 20 1467 1473 16855634
  34. [36]Russell SJ Rajkumar SV Multiple myeloma and the road to personalised medicine Lancet Oncol 2011 12 617 619 21664869
  35. [37]Durie BG Salmon SE A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma. Correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival Cancer 1975 36 842 854 1182674
  36. [38]Greipp PR San Miguel JF Durie BG International staging system for multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2005 23 3412 3420 15809451
  37. [39]Hari PN Zhang MJ Roy V Is the international staging system superior to the Durie-Salmon staging system? A comparison in multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous transplant Leukemia 2009 23 1528 1534 19322205 PMC2726276
  38. [40]Fonseca R Bergsagel PL Drach J International Myeloma Working Group molecular classification of multiple myeloma: Spotlight review Leukemia 2009 23 2210 2221 19798094 PMC2964268
  39. [41]Kumar SK Rajkumar SV Dispenzieri A Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies Blood 2008 111 2516 2520 17975015 PMC2254544
  40. [43]Richardson PG Sonneveld P Schuster MW Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma [see comment] N Engl J Med 2005 352 2487 2498 15958804
  41. [44]Rajkumar SV Hayman SR Lacy MQ Combination therapy with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) for newly diagnosed myeloma Blood 2005 106 4050 4053 16118317 PMC1895238
  42. [45]Richardson PG Blood E Mitsiades CS A randomized phase 2 study of lenalidomide therapy for patients with relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma Blood 2006 108 3458 3464 16840727 PMC1895441
  43. [47]Kumar S Rajkumar SV Many facets of bortezomib resistance/susceptibility Blood 2008 112 2177 2178 18779399
  44. [48]Gutman D Morales AA Boise LH Acquisition of a multidrug-resistant phenotype with a proteasome inhibitor in multiple myeloma Leukemia 2009 23 2181 2183 19516276 PMC2783738
  45. [49]Quach H Ritchie D Stewart AK Mechanism of action of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDS) in multiple myeloma Leukemia 2010 24 22 32 19907437 PMC3922408
  46. [50]Ito T Ando H Suzuki T Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity Science 2010 327 1345 1350 20223979
  47. [51]Zhu YX Braggio E Shi CX Cereblon expression is required for the anti-myeloma activity of lenalidomide and pomalidomide Blood 2011 118 4771 4779 21860026 PMC3208291
  48. [52]Kyle RA Rajkumar SV Multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2004 351 1860 1873 15509819
  49. [53]Rajkumar SV Blood E Vesole DH Fonseca R Greipp PR Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A Clinical Trial Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group J Clin Oncol 2006 24 431 436 16365178
  50. [54]Rajkumar SV Rosiñol L Hussein M A multicenter, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone versus dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2008 26 2171 2177 18362366 PMC3904367
  51. [55]Rajkumar SV Jacobus S Callander NS Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An open-label randomised controlled trial Lancet Oncol 2010 11 29 37 19853510 PMC3042271
  52. [56]Harousseau J Attal M Leleu X Bortezomib plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of an IFM phase II study Haematologica 2006 91 1498 1505 17043025
  53. [57]Facon T Mary JY Hulin C Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide versus melphalan and prednisone alone or reduced-intensity autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma (IFM 99-06): A randomised trial Lancet 2007 370 1209 1218 17920916
  54. [58]Hulin C Facon T Rodon P Efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial J Clin Oncol 2009 27 3664 3670 19451428
  55. [59]Mateos MV Oriol A Martinez-Lopez J Bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone (VMP) versus bortezomib/thalidomide/prednisone (VTP) as induction therapy followed by maintenance treatment with bortezomib/thalidomide (VT) versus bortezomib/prednisone (VP): A randomised trial in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma older than 65 years Lancet Oncol 2010 11 934 941 20739218
  56. [61]San Miguel JF Schlag R Khuageva NK Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2008 359 906 917 18753647
  57. [62]Cavo M Tacchetti P Patriarca F Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stemcell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A randomised phase 3 study Lancet 2010 376 2075 2085 21146205
  58. [63]Reeder CB Reece DE Kukreti V Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone induction for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: High response rates in a phase II clinical trial Leukemia 2009 23 1337 1341 19225538 PMC2711213
  59. [65]Richardson PG Weller E Lonial S Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Blood 2010 116 679 686 20385792 PMC3324254
  60. [67]Kumar SK Flinn I Noga SJ Bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and lenalidomide combination for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Phase 1 results from the multicenter EVOLUTION study Leukemia 2010 24 1350 1356 20508619 PMC2957585
  61. [68]Barlogie B Anaissie E van Rhee F Incorporating bortezomib into upfront treatment for multiple myeloma: Early results of total therapy 3 Br J Haematol 2007 138 176 185 17593024
  62. [69]van Rhee F Szymonifka J Anaissie E Total therapy 3 for multiple myeloma: Prognostic implications of cumulative dosing and premature discontinuation of VTD maintenance components, bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone, relevant to all phases of therapy Blood 2010 116 1220 1227 20501894 PMC2938233
  63. [70]Harousseau JL Attal M Avet-Loiseau H Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Results of the IFM 2005-01 Phase III Trial J Clin Oncol 2010 28 4621 4629 20823406
  64. [72]Wijermans P Schaafsma M Termorshuizen F Phase III study of the value of thalidomide added to melphalan plus prednisone in elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The HOVON 49 Study J Clin Oncol 2010 28 3160 3166 20516439
  65. [73]Palumbo A Bringhen S Liberati AM Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Updated results of a randomized controlled trial Blood 2008 112 3107 3114 18505783
  66. [74]Waage A Gimsing P Fayers P Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma Blood 2010 116 1405 1412 20448107
  67. [75]Mateos M-V Richardson PG Schlag R Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone compared with melphalan and prednisone in previously untreated multiple myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Impact of Subsequent Therapy in the Phase III VISTA Trial J Clin Oncol 2010 28 2259 2266 20368561
  68. [76]Rajkumar SV Treatment of myeloma: Cure vs control Mayo Clinic Proc 2008 83 1142 1145 PMC3923461 18828974
  69. [77]Haessler J Shaughnessy JD Jr Zhan F Benefit of complete response in multiple myeloma limited to high-risk subgroup identified by gene expression profiling Clin Cancer Res 2007 13 7073 7079 18056185
  70. [78]Palumbo A Cavo M Bringhen S Aspirin, warfarin, or enoxaparin thrombo-prophylaxis in patients with multiple myeloma treated with thalidomide: A phase III, open-label, randomized trial J Clin Oncol 2011 29 986 993 21282540
  71. [79]Larocca A Cavallo F Bringhen S Aspirin or enoxaparin thrombo-prophylaxis for newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with lenalidomide Blood 2011 blood-2011-03-344333; published ahead of print August 11, 2011 21835953
  72. [80]Palumbo A Rajkumar SV Dimopoulos MA Prevention of thalidomide-and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma Leuk: Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund, UK 2008 22 414 423 18094721
  73. [81]Zonder JA Crowley J Hussein MA Lenalidomide and high-dose dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for multiple myeloma: A randomized Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0232) Blood 2010 116 5838 5841 20876454 PMC3031379
  74. [82]Kumar S Dispenzieri A Lacy MQ Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma Leukemia 2007 21 2035 2042 17581613
  75. [83]Kumar S Giralt S Stadtmauer EA Mobilization in myeloma revisited: IMWG consensus perspectives on stem cell collection following initial therapy with thalidomide-, lenalidomide-, or bortezomib-containing regimens Blood 2009 114 1729 1735 19561323
  76. [84]Giralt S Stadtmauer EA Harousseau JL International myeloma working group (IMWG) consensus statement and guidelines regarding the current status of stem cell collection and high-dose therapy for multiple myeloma and the role of plerixafor (AMD 3100) Leukemia 2009 23 1904 1912 19554029
  77. [85]Nair B van Rhee F Shaughnessy JD Jr Superior results of total therapy 3 (2003-33) in gene expression profiling-defined low-risk multiple myeloma confirmed in subsequent trial 2006-66 with VRD maintenance Blood 2010 115 4168 4173 20124509 PMC2879104
  78. [86]Moreau P Pylypenko H Grosicki S Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: A randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study Lancet Oncol 2011 12 431 440 21507715
  79. [87]Moreau P Hulin C Marit G Stem cell collection in patients with de novo multiple myeloma treated with the combination of bortezomib and dexamethasone before autologous stem cell transplantation according to IFM 2005-01 trial Leukemia 2010 24 1233 1235 20428201
  80. [88]Palumbo A Bringhen S Caravita T Oral melphalan and prednisone chemotherapy plus thalidomide compared with melphalan and prednisone alone in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Randomised controlled trial Lancet 2006 367 825 831 16530576
  81. [89]Kapoor P Rajkumar SV Dispenzieri A Melphalan and prednisone versus melphalan, prednisone and thalidomide for elderly and/or transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis Leuk: Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund UK 2011 25 689 696 21233832
  82. [90]Fayers PM Palumbo A Hulin C Thalidomide for previously untreated elderly patients with multiple myeloma: Meta-analysis of 1685 individual patient data from 6 randomized clinical trials Blood 2011 118 1239 1247 21670471
  83. [92]Kyle RA Rajkumar SV Multiple myeloma Blood 2008 111 2962 2972 18332230 PMC2265446
  84. [93]Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group Combination chemotherapy versus melphalan plus prednisone as treatment for multiple myeloma: An overview of 6,633 patients from 27 randomized trials J Clin Oncol 1998 16 3832 3842 9850028
  85. [95]Attal M Harousseau JL Stoppa AM A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome N Engl J Med 1996 335 91 97 8649495
  86. [96]Child JA Morgan GJ Davies FE High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2003 348 1875 1883 12736280
  87. [99]Fermand JP Ravaud P Chevret S High-dose therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: Up-front or rescue treatment? Results of a multicenter sequential randomized clinical trial Blood 1998 92 3131 3136 9787148
  88. [104]Cavo M Cellini C Zamagni E Superiority of double over single autologous stem cell transplantation as first-line therapy for multiple myeloma Blood 2004 104 155a (A536) 15257934
  89. [107]Stewart AK Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplantation for myeloma: Reality bites Blood 2009 113 3135 3136 19342498
  90. [108]Attal M Harousseau J-L Leyvraz S Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma Blood 2006 108 3289 3294 16873668
  91. [109]Spencer A Prince HM Roberts AW Consolidation therapy with low-dose thalidomide and prednisolone prolongs the survival of multiple myeloma patients undergoing a single autologous stem-cell transplantation procedure J Clin Oncol 2009 27 1788 1793 19273705
  92. [113]Kumar SK Therneau TM Gertz MA Clinical course of patients with relapsed multiple myeloma Mayo Clinic Proc 2004 79 867 874 15244382
  93. [115]Dimopoulos M Spencer A Attal M Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 2007 357 2123 2132 18032762
  94. [119]Orlowski RZ Nagler A Sonneveld P Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Combination therapy improves time to progression J Clin Oncol 2007 25 3892 3901 17679727
  95. [120]Lacy MQ Hayman SR Gertz MA Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low-dose dexamethasone as therapy for relapsed multiple myeloma J Clin Oncol 2009 27 5008 5014 19720894
  96. [121]Lacy MQ Hayman SR Gertz MA Pomalidomide (CC4047) plus low dose dexamethasone (Pom/dex) is active and well tolerated in lenalidomide refractory multiple myeloma (MM) Leuk: Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund UK 2010 24 1934 1939 PMC2978257 20827286
  97. [122]Demo SD Kirk CJ Aujay MA Antitumor activity of PR-171, a novel irreversible inhibitor of the proteasome Cancer Res 2007 67 6383 6391 17616698

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajkumar, S. V.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Rajkumar, S. Vincent
Venue
American Journal of Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-17
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
78-88
ISSN
  • 0361-8609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8652
OpenAlex
W2164357850
Cited by
144
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 25
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA107476)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
multiple myeloma, diagnosis, risk stratification, 17p deletion, gene expression profiling, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, autologous stem cell transplantation, bortezomib, maintenance therapy, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, pomalidomide, carfilzomib, target organ damage
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Recurrence, Risk, Transplantation, Autologous, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Maintenance Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review