Cited by 16Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

A phase I study of lenalidomide plus chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine for the reinduction of patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Open access
DeAngelo, Daniel J., Brunner, Andrew M., Werner, Lillian, Avigan, David, Fathi, Amir T., Sperling, Adam S., Washington, Abigail, Stroopinsky, Dina +11 more·2018·American Journal of Hematology

Abstract

Patients with relapsed AML have a poor prognosis and limited responses to standard chemotherapy. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug that may modulate anti‐tumor immunity. We performed a study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of lenalidomide with mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine (MEC) in relapsed/refractory AML. Adult patients with relapsed/refractory AML were eligible for this phase I dose‐escalation study. We enrolled 35 patients using a “3 + 3” design, with a 10 patient expansion cohort at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Lenalidomide was initially given days 1‐14 and MEC days 4‐8; due to delayed count recovery, the protocol was amended to administer lenalidomide days 1‐10. The dose of lenalidomide was then escalated starting at 5 mg/d (5‐10‐25‐50). The primary objective was tolerability and MTD determination, with secondary outcomes including overall survival (OS). The MTD of lenalidomide combined with MEC was 50 mg/d days 1‐10. Among the 35 enrolled patients, 12 achieved complete remission (CR) (34%, 90%CI 21‐50%); 30‐day mortality was 6% and 60‐day mortality 13%. The median OS for all patients was 11.5 months. Among 17 patients treated at the MTD, 7 attained CR (41%); the median OS was not reached while 12‐month OS was 61%. Following therapy with MEC and lenalidomide, patient CD4+ and CD8+ T‐cells demonstrated increased inflammatory responses to autologous tumor lysate. The combination of MEC and lenalidomide is tolerable with an RP2D of lenalidomide 50 mg/d days 1‐10, yielding encouraging response rates. Further studies are planned to explore the potential immunomodulatory effect of lenalidomide and MEC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajh.24968

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with R/R AML, the combination of high-dose lenalidomide (50 mg daily) with mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine resulted in a CR or CR with incomplete haematological recovery rate of 41%, which is considerably higher than expected with MEC alone (17-28%) based on data from historical cohorts.

    “In patients with R/R AML, the combination of high-dose lenalidomide (50 mg daily) with mitoxantrone, etoposide and cytarabine (MEC) resulted in a CR or CR with incomplete haematological recovery (CR/CRi) rate of 41%104, which is considerably higher than expected with MEC alone (17–28%) based on data from historical cohorts105,106.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 16

Authors
DeAngelo, D. J., Brunner, A. M., Werner, L., Avigan, D., Fathi, A. T., Sperling, A. S., Washington, A., Stroopinsky, D., Rosenblatt, J., McMasters, M., Luptakova, K., Wadleigh, M., Steensma, D. P., Hobbs, G. S., Attar, E. C., Amrein, P. C., Ebert, B. L., Stone, R. M., & Ballen, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Takeda Oncology (United States) (US)
  • Agios Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
  • DeAngelo, Daniel J.
  • Brunner, Andrew M.
Venue
American Journal of Hematology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-21
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
254-261
ISSN
  • 0361-8609 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8652
OpenAlex
W2767377489
Cited by
16
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • European Hematology Association (TRTH160)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL082945, T32HL116324)
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA206963, P01CA066996)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
lenalidomide, acute myeloid leukemia, relapsed/refractory AML, mitoxantrone, etoposide, cytarabine, immunomodulators, maximum tolerated dose, complete remission, overall survival, autologous tumor lysate, combination chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Cytarabine, Etoposide, Humans, Mitoxantrone, Remission Induction, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Survival Analysis, Salvage Therapy, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Maximum Tolerated Dose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review