Cited by 23Body Composition Measurement TechniquesClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

A cellular level approach to predicting resting energy expenditure: Evaluation of applicability in adolescents

Open access
Wang, ZiMian, Heymsfield, Steven B., Ying, Zhiliang, Pierson, Richard N., Gallagher, Dympna, Gidwani, Sonia·2010·American Journal of Human Biology

Abstract

We previously derived a cellular level approach for a whole‐body resting energy expenditure (REE) prediction model by using organ and tissue mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with their individual cellularity and assumed stable‐specific resting metabolic rates. Although this approach predicts REE well in both young and elderly adults, there were no studies in adolescents that specifically evaluated REE in relation to organ–tissue mass. It is unclear whether the approach can be applied to rapidly growing adolescents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the applicability of the previous developed REE prediction model in adolescents, and to compare its applicability in young and elderly adults. Specifically, we tested the hypothesis that measured REE can be predicted from a combination of individual organ and tissue mass and their related cellularity. This was a 2‐year longitudinal investigation. Twenty healthy male subjects with a mean age of 14.7 years had REE, organ and tissue mass, body cell mass, and fat‐free mass (FFM) measured by indirect calorimetry, whole‐body MRI, whole‐body 40 K counting and dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry, respectively. The predicted REE (REEp; mean ± SD, 1,487 ± 238 kcal/day) was correlated with the measured REE (REEm, 1,606 ± 237 kcal/day, r = 0.76, P < 0.001). The mean difference (118 ± 165 kcal/day) between REEm and REEp was significant (P = 0.0047), accounting for 7.3% of REEm for the entire group. The present study, the first of its type in adolescents, does not support the applicability of the organ–tissue‐based REE prediction model during rapid adolescent growth. A modified general REE prediction model is thus suggested which may account for the higher REE/FFM ratio observed in adolescents. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajhb.21020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At rest, the heart, liver, brain, and kidneys have much higher tissue-specific metabolic rates than muscles, other lean tissue, or fat.

    “At rest, the tissue-specific metabolic rates (Watts/gram) of the heart, liver, brain, and kidneys are much greater than those of the muscles and other lean tissue or fat (21–25).”

    From Daily energy expenditure through the human life course (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

  • This pattern agrees with prior work reporting elevated tissue-specific metabolic rates in children and adolescents and reduced rates in older adults.

    “consistent with previous work indicating that tissue-specific metabolic rates are elevated in children and adolescents (22, 24) and reduced in older adults (21, 23, 25).”

    From Daily energy expenditure through the human life course (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., Heymsfield, S. B., Ying, Z., Pierson, R. N., Gallagher, D., & Gidwani, S.
Affiliations
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, ZiMian
Venue
American Journal of Human Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-07
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
476-483
ISSN
  • 1042-0533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6300
OpenAlex
W2050359315
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Human Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21dk074877-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R21DK074877, R21 DK074877, P30 DK-26687, R21DK081633, P30DK026687)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
resting energy expenditure, adolescents, cellularity, body cell mass, fat-free mass, rapid growth, whole-body MRI, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, indirect calorimetry
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Rest, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adolescent Development, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review