Water insecurity: An agenda for research and call to action for human biology
Abstract
Water insecurity—the lack of adequate and safe water for a healthy and productive life—is one of the greatest threats facing humans in the coming century. By 2030, half of the world is expected to be living in water‐stressed conditions, given current climate change scenarios. A key goal of the UN Water Action Decade and Sustainable Development Goal 6 is to improve water security for the three billion people globally affected, but the future looks grim. For many communities, from Cape Town, South Africa to Flint, United States, the imagined dystopian future of severe water shortages has already arrived—shaped not so much by lack of water, but by aging infrastructure, underfunded utilities, social exclusion, politicized commodification, and environmental racism. Stepping off from my biocultural research in Cochabamba, Bolivia, I discuss how recent research is dramatically advancing our understanding of water insecurity, such as new findings around the biocultural causes and consequences of dehydration, contamination, and water stress. But, much more needs be done to support local communities in creating fair and just water systems. I discuss how human biologists can make crucial contributions toward the advancement of a much‐needed science of water insecurity, while highlighting some practical and ethical challenges to advancing a core mission of providing safe, sufficient water to all.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
WASH-GBV stressors are well articulated in non-humanitarian contexts.
“While WASH-GBV stressors are well articulated in non-humanitarian contexts (Bisung & Elliott 2017; Pouramin et al . 2020; Wutich 2020; Nunbogu & Elliott 2022)”
From Water insecurity and sexual and gender-based violence among refugee youth: qualitative insights from a humanitarian setting in Uganda (2022) · cites this paper as Wutich 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 86
- Authors
- Wutich, A.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wutich, Amber
- ORCID
- Wutich, Amber
- Venue
- American Journal of Human Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-11-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e23345-e23345
- ISSN
- 1042-0533 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6300
- OpenAlex
- W2983879398
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 44.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Human Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1759972, 1637590, 1462086, 0314395)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
- Social Sciences › Law › Water Resources and Governance
- Keywords
- water insecurity, water stress, dehydration, water pollution, environmental racism, commodification of water, aging water infrastructure, water justice, SDG 6, Cochabamba, Flint water crisis, research agenda
- MeSH terms
- Bolivia, Dehydration, Food Supply, Humans, Water, Water Pollution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review