Early identification and intervention in the prevention of musculoskeletal pain
Abstract
Background A large number of people suffer from upper extremity disorders, but a few apparently consume the majority of the resources. Early interventions are badly needed to prevent the development of persistent disability. Since psychological factors are central in the development of a chronic problem these might be utilized in this endeavor. Methods A series of studies are described where a screening procedure based on psychological risk factors was employed to help identify people at risk for developing long-term work disability. The utility of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention that focuses on coping strategies as prevention was assessed in three randomized-controlled studies where participants had low, medium, and high risk, respectively. Results The study with low risk showed no significant difference between the groups, while the studies with medium- and high-risk populations demonstrated significantly lower work disability than control groups receiving treatment as usual. Conclusions It appears to be feasible to identify patients with high levels of risk and to subsequently lower the risk for work disability by administering a cognitive-behavioral intervention focusing on psychological aspects of the pain problem.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is growing recognition that early intervention might be especially important in the treatment of medical disorders that are painful.
“There is growing recognition that early intervention might be especially important in the treatment of medical disorders that are painful.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [62]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 84
- Authors
- Linton, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Örebro University Hospital (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Linton, Steven James
- ORCID
- Linton, Steven James
- Venue
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-04-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 433-442
- ISSN
- 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0274
- OpenAlex
- W2102044575
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- musculoskeletal pain, upper limb disorders, work disability prevention, early detection, psychological risk factors, screening, cognitive-behavioral intervention, coping strategies, occupational health
- MeSH terms
- Arm Injuries, Back Pain, Humans, Neuromuscular Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Pain, Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Risk Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review