Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 25

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative analysis of asbestos burden in women with mesothelioma

Dodson, Ronald F., O'Sullivan, Michael, Brooks, Dwaina R., Hammar, Samuel P.·2003·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Background: Lung tissue from 15 women who died from mesothelioma was evaluated for tissue burden of ferruginous bodies and uncoated asbestos fibers. The group contained individuals who had occupational exposure to asbestos and others had family members whose work history included vocations where contact with asbestos containing materials occurred. Methods: Tissue samples from tumor free lung were digested and filtered and then investigated for ferruginous bodies by light microscopy and asbestos and non‐asbestos fibers by analytical transmission electron microscopy (ATEM). Size and type of fibers were also analyzed. Results: Asbestos bodies were found in 13 of the 15 samples and asbestos fibers were found in all cases. The most commonly found uncoated asbestos fiber in these individuals was amosite whereas tremolite was the second most commonly found form. The asbestos fiber burden in these females was often of mixed types. Conclusions: The asbestos body and fiber burden in these cases show variation in tissue burden. Some cases in this study had appreciable burden, which was attributed to secondhand exposure from occupationally exposed family members. Mesothelioma can occur also in individuals with comparatively low tissue burdens of asbestos. Am. J. Ind. Med. 43: 188–195, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.10164

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Craighead JE, 1982, The pathology of asbestos‐associated diseases of the lungs and pleural cavities: Diagnostic criteria and proposed grading schema, Arch Pathol Lab Med, 106, 544
  2. 10.1001/jama.252.1.68 · doi:10.1001/jama.252.1.68
  3. 10.2307/3431088 · doi:10.2307/3431088
  4. Stanton MF, 1981, Relation of particle dimension to carcinogenicity in amphibole asbestoses and other fibrous minerals, J Natl Cancer Inst, 67, 965

Cited by

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Dodson, R. F., O'Sullivan, M., Brooks, D. R., & Hammar, S. P.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01-22
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
188-195
ISSN
  • 0271-3586
  • 1097-0274
Cited by
25
References
29
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative analysis of asbestos burden in women with mesothelioma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajim.10164
The paper
Dodson, R. F., O'Sullivan, M., Brooks, D. R., & Hammar, S. P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of asbestos burden in women with mesothelioma. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10164

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.