Cause-specific mortality among a cohort of U.S. flight attendants
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated mortality among 11,311 former U.S. flight attendants. The primary a priori outcomes of interest were breast cancer and melanoma. METHODS: Vital status was ascertained through 2007, and life table analyses was conducted. Cumulative exposure to cosmic radiation and circadian rhythm disruption were estimated from work history data and historical published flight schedules. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was less than expected among women but was elevated among men, primarily due to elevated HIV-related disease mortality. Mortality from breast cancer among women and melanoma was neither significantly elevated nor related to metrics of exposure. Mortality was elevated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men; for alcoholism, drowning, and intentional self-harm among women; and for railway, water, and air transportation accidents. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of increased breast cancer or melanoma mortality. Limitations include reliance on mortality data and limited power resulting from few melanoma deaths and relatively short employment durations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are increased rates of cardiac disease, depression and anxiety, sleep disturbances, skin and reproductive cancers, and hearing loss in this population.
“There are also increased rates of cardiac disease, depression and anxiety (Pinkerton et al., 2012), sleep disturbances, skin and reproductive cancers and hearing loss (Czura, 2005; McNeely et al., 2014).”
From Effectiveness of a Novel Qigong Meditative Movement Practice for Impaired Health in Flight Attendants Exposed to Second-Hand Cigarette Smoke (2017) · cites this paper as Pinkerton et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Pinkerton, L. E., Waters, M. A., Hein, M. J., Zivkovich, Z., Schubauer‐Berigan, M. K., & Grajewski, B.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pinkerton, Lynne E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-10-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0274
- OpenAlex
- W2022699354
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Keywords
- flight attendants, occupational mortality, cosmic radiation exposure, circadian rhythm disruption, breast cancer mortality, melanoma mortality, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, transport accidents, sex differences in mortality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aircraft, Breast Neoplasms, Cause of Death, Circadian Rhythm, Cosmic Radiation, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Poisson Distribution, Occupational Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review