Cited by 39Sleep and Work-Related FatigueGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Cause-specific mortality among a cohort of U.S. flight attendants

Pinkerton, Lynne E., Waters, Martha A., Hein, Misty J., Zivkovich, Zachary, Schubauer‐Berigan, Mary K., Grajewski, Barbara·2012·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated mortality among 11,311 former U.S. flight attendants. The primary a priori outcomes of interest were breast cancer and melanoma. METHODS: Vital status was ascertained through 2007, and life table analyses was conducted. Cumulative exposure to cosmic radiation and circadian rhythm disruption were estimated from work history data and historical published flight schedules. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was less than expected among women but was elevated among men, primarily due to elevated HIV-related disease mortality. Mortality from breast cancer among women and melanoma was neither significantly elevated nor related to metrics of exposure. Mortality was elevated for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men; for alcoholism, drowning, and intentional self-harm among women; and for railway, water, and air transportation accidents. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of increased breast cancer or melanoma mortality. Limitations include reliance on mortality data and limited power resulting from few melanoma deaths and relatively short employment durations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.21011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 39

Authors
Pinkerton, L. E., Waters, M. A., Hein, M. J., Zivkovich, Z., Schubauer‐Berigan, M. K., & Grajewski, B.
Affiliations
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Corresponding author
Pinkerton, Lynne E.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-10
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W2022699354
Cited by
39
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
flight attendants, occupational mortality, cosmic radiation exposure, circadian rhythm disruption, breast cancer mortality, melanoma mortality, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, transport accidents, sex differences in mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aircraft, Breast Neoplasms, Cause of Death, Circadian Rhythm, Cosmic Radiation, Female, Humans, Male, Melanoma, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, United States, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Poisson Distribution, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review