Cited by 16Medical Coding and Health InformationGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Capture and coding of industry and occupation measures: findings from eight National Program of Cancer Registries states

Open access
Freeman, MaryBeth B., Pollack, Lori A., Rees, Judy R., Johnson, Christopher J., Rycroft, Randi K., Rousseau, David L., Hsieh, Mei‐Chin, On behalf of the enhancement of NPCR for comparative effectiveness research team·2017·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Background: Although data on industry and occupation (I&O) are important for understanding cancer risks, obtaining standardized data is challenging. This study describes the capture of specific I&O text and the ability of a web‐based tool to translate text into standardized codes. Methods: Data on 62 525 cancers cases received from eight National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) states were submitted to a web‐based coding tool developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for translation into standardized I&O codes. We determined the percentage of sufficiently analyzable codes generated by the tool. Results: Using the web‐based coding tool on data obtained from chart abstraction, the NPCR cancer registries achieved between 48% and 75% autocoding, but only 12‐57% sufficiently analyzable codes. Conclusions: The ability to explore associations between work‐related exposures and cancer is limited by current capture and coding of I&O data. Increased training of providers and registrars, as well as software enhancements, will improve the utility of I&O data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.22739

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NIOSH Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System, a free web-based system, was evaluated and recommended by several studies for increasing the quality of occupation data prior to analysis.

    “For researchers seeking to increase the quality of occupation data prior to analysis, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has created a free, web-based system called NIOSH Industry and Occupation Computerized Coding System78 that was evaluated and recommended by several studies.10,60,62,76”

    From The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Materials and Methods section (page unavailable) describes NIOCCS as a freely available web-based system and evaluates its coding of occupation and industry text. The Discussion (page unavailable) says researchers can use its confidence levels to balance capture against coding confidence, but does not explicitly recommend it as a way to increase the quality of occupation data before analysis. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Six of the 7 studies (86%) that looked at the quality of occupational data primarily examined completeness, all noting that occupational information is frequently missing from the health record.

    “Six of the 7 studies (86%) that looked at the quality of occupational data primarily examined completeness, all noting that occupational information is frequently missing from the health record.10,60–64”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Hutton MD Burnett CA Occupation of cancer patients: a challenge to healthcare facilities J Ahima 1996 67 64 68 10157912
  2. [10]Chen VW Eheman CR Johnson CJ Enhancing cancer registry data for comparative effectiveness research (CER) project: overview and methodology J Registry Manag 2014 41 103 112 25419602 PMC4524450
  3. [16]Weiss NS Cooper SP Socias C Weiss RA Chen VW Coding of central cancer registry industry and occupation information: the texas and louisiana experiences J Registry Manag 2015 42 103 110 27028094

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, M. B., Pollack, L. A., Rees, J. R., Johnson, C. J., Rycroft, R. K., Rousseau, D. L., Hsieh, M., & On behalf of the enhancement of NPCR for comparative effectiveness research team
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Cancer Data Registry of Idaho Boise, Idaho
  • Colorado Central Cancer Registry Denver, Colorado
  • Rhode Island Cancer Registry Providence, Rhode Island
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans (US)
Corresponding author
Freeman, MaryBeth B.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-07-10
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
689-695
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W2736094568
Cited by
16
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U58/DP000792)
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
cancer registry, occupational cancer, data capture, National Program of Cancer Registries, medical records review
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Humans, Neoplasms, Occupational Diseases, Occupations, Registries, Software, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review