Stress, Health, and Injury Among Illinois Farmers
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The goal of this cross‐sectional study was to characterize stress, injury, and chronic health conditions among agricultural producers in Illinois. The objectives were to: (1) describe the prevalence and nature of work‐related injuries; (2) describe chronic health conditions, stress, and symptoms of mental health conditions; and (3) explore relationships between work‐related injuries and stress, mental health, and health conditions. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was conducted using a modified Dillman approach. Agricultural producers received mailed questionnaires assessing demographics, farm characteristics, chronic health conditions, stress (using the PSS questionnaire), anxiety (GAD‐7), depression (PHQ‐9), and work‐related injuries. Descriptive statistics describe the population, farm characteristics, injuries, symptoms of mental health, and chronic health conditions. Chi‐squared tests describe associations between variables. Results: Agricultural injuries were reported by 8.01% of respondents, and were primarily minor or moderate. Nearly half (49.07%) reported moderate to high stress, and 10.83% had symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety. No significant associations were found between injury and stress, anxiety, or depression. Conclusions: These findings highlight the complex interplay between health, stress, and safety in agricultural workers. Longitudinal and qualitative approaches are needed to better understand how stress and chronic conditions may relate to agricultural injuries.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The PHQ ‐ 9 scale has demonstrated excellent reliability and validity [26, 28] across a variety of settings and populations [30] including agricultural environments [31, 32].”
Johnson, S. U., Ulvenes, P. G., Øktedalen, T., & Hoffart, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01713 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Levis, B., Sun, Y., He, C., Wu, Y., Krishnan, A., Bhandari, P. M., Neupane, D., Imran, M., Brehaut, E., Negeri, Z., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6504 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Villarreal-Zegarra, D., Barrera-Begazo, J., Otazú-Alfaro, S., Mayo-Puchoc, N., Bazo-Alvarez, J. C., & Huarcaya-Victoria, J. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076193 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Rudolphi, J. M., Issa, S., Cuthbertson, C., & Barnett, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rudolphi, Josie M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-07-02
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 761-771
- ISSN
- 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0274
- PMC
- PMC12337616
- OpenAlex
- W4412012538
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U54OH012503)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- agricultural labor, occupational stress, occupational injuries, chronic disease, anxiety, depression, mental health, farm safety, psychosocial stress, Illinois
- MeSH terms
- Farmers, Occupational Stress, Adult, Aged, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Illinois, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Young Adult, Occupational Injuries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review