Cited by 0Agriculture and Farm SafetyWorkplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Stress, Health, and Injury Among Illinois Farmers

Open access
Rudolphi, Josie M., Issa, Salah, Cuthbertson, Courtney, Barnett, Kaleigh·2025·American Journal of Industrial Medicine

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this cross‐sectional study was to characterize stress, injury, and chronic health conditions among agricultural producers in Illinois. The objectives were to: (1) describe the prevalence and nature of work‐related injuries; (2) describe chronic health conditions, stress, and symptoms of mental health conditions; and (3) explore relationships between work‐related injuries and stress, mental health, and health conditions. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was conducted using a modified Dillman approach. Agricultural producers received mailed questionnaires assessing demographics, farm characteristics, chronic health conditions, stress (using the PSS questionnaire), anxiety (GAD‐7), depression (PHQ‐9), and work‐related injuries. Descriptive statistics describe the population, farm characteristics, injuries, symptoms of mental health, and chronic health conditions. Chi‐squared tests describe associations between variables. Results: Agricultural injuries were reported by 8.01% of respondents, and were primarily minor or moderate. Nearly half (49.07%) reported moderate to high stress, and 10.83% had symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety. No significant associations were found between injury and stress, anxiety, or depression. Conclusions: These findings highlight the complex interplay between health, stress, and safety in agricultural workers. Longitudinal and qualitative approaches are needed to better understand how stress and chronic conditions may relate to agricultural injuries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajim.70000

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rudolphi, J. M., Issa, S., Cuthbertson, C., & Barnett, K.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Rudolphi, Josie M.
Venue
American Journal of Industrial Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-07-02
Volume
68
Issue
9
Pages
761-771
ISSN
  • 0271-3586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0274
OpenAlex
W4412012538
Cited by
0
References
4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Industrial Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U54OH012503)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
agricultural labor, occupational stress, occupational injuries, chronic disease, anxiety, depression, mental health, farm safety, psychosocial stress, Illinois
MeSH terms
Farmers, Occupational Stress, Adult, Aged, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Illinois, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence, Young Adult, Occupational Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review