The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new genetic concept: Uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy
Abstract
In recent years, cytogenetic studies of spontaneous abortion products have disclosed a relatively high frequency of aneuploid embryos. These karyotypic anomalies chiefly stem from meiotic errors affecting the distribution of the chromosomes in one of the two gametes. This information not only implies the remarkable frequency of gonocyte aneuploidy but also reveals the prevalence of certain types of errors. It follows that gametal haploidy is often altered by the loss (nullisomy) or the addition (disomy) of certain members, in particular the X, the Y, and chromosomes 15, 16, 21, and 22. Therefore, it is to be expected that, in some exceptional zygotes, euploidy could result from the random union of a disomic gamete with a gamete nullisomic for the homologue. To this hypothetical phenomenon ‐ which is, however, statistically likely and foreseeable ‐ we have ascribed the name of uniparental disomy, owing to the fact that both members of such a pair arise from only one parent. Furthermore, such a mechanism implies the probability of introducing into the genome pairs of chromosomes with whole sequences of identical alleles, a consequence which we describe by the neologism of isodisomy. Such homozygosity for a series of colinear alleles implies, from the genetic stand‐point, risks and advantages akin to those of parental consanguinity. An analogous mechanism could also modulate and modify the consequences of trisomies in which entire segments of two of the three implicated chromosomes, including the supernumerary one, could as well be isoallelic (isodisomic trisomy or di‐isotrisomy). This article briefly states some other predictions stemming from the concept of uniparental disomy, whose confirmation should serve as a test of the proposed hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotyped spontaneous human abortions
Boué, J., Boué, A., & Lazar, P. (1975) · Teratology · doi:10.1002/tera.1420120103 · Cited by 661
SURVIVAL OF HEPATITIS B VIRUS AFTER DRYING AND STORAGE FOR ONE WEEK
BOND, W. (1981) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92877-4 · Cited by 584
Carter, C. O. (1969) · Problems of Birth Defects · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-6621-8_19 · Cited by 295
CARTER, C. O. (1969) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070671 · Cited by 285
A cytogenetic study of human spontaneous abortions using banding techniques
Creasy, M. R., Crolla, J. A., & Alberman, E. D. (1976) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00296145 · Cited by 252
Lauritsen, J. G. (1976) · Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/00016347609156437 · Cited by 194
Heteromorphic X chromosomes in 46,XX males: Evidence for the involvement of X-Y interchange
Evans, H. J., BUCKTON, K. E., Spowart, G., & Carothers, A. D. (1979) · Human Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf00277683 · Cited by 102
A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions in Hawaii
Hassold, T., MATSUYAMA, A., Newlands, I. M., Matsuura, J. S., Jacobs, P. A., MANUEL, B., & Tsuei, J. T. (1978) · Annals of Human Genetics · doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb00914.x · Cited by 95
Hemophilia A in chromosomal female subjects
Lusher, J. M., Zuelzer, W. W., & Evans, R. K. (1969) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(69)80075-2 · Cited by 11
Cited by
Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm
Ferguson-Smith, A. C. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3032 · Cited by 838
(1988) · PubMed · Cited by 489
Retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases: numerous diseases, genes, and inheritance patterns
Rivolta, C. (2002) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/11.10.1219 · Cited by 296
Molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical investigations of Prader-Willi syndrome patients
Robinson, W. P., Bottani, A., Yagang, X., Balakrishman, J., Binkert, F., Mächler, M., Prader, A., & Schinzel, A. (1991) · PubMed · doi:10.5167/uzh-232879 · Cited by 279
A recurrent 14q32.2 microdeletion mediated by expanded TGG repeats
Bena, F., Gimelli, S., Migliavacca, E., Brun-Druc, N., Buiting, K., Antonarakis, S. E., & Sharp, A. J. (2010) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq075 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Engel, E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-143
- ISSN
- 0148-7299 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8628
- OpenAlex
- W2007214149
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new genetic concept: Uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.1320060207
- The paper
- Engel, E. (1980). A new genetic concept: Uniparental disomy and its potential effect, isodisomy. American Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320060207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.