down syndrome children often have brain with maturation delay, retardation of growth, and cortical dysgenesis.
Abstract
All Down syndrome (DS) children have different degrees of developmental disabilities, developmental delay, and developmental brain abnormalities associated with CNS maturation delay and cortical dysgenesis. We have examined 780 occipitofrontal circumferences (OFC), mean and +/- SD, of DS children from birth to age 5 years. Also, gross and microscopic neuropathological studies in the same age group were performed, with special attention to brain weight (BW), shape, myelin formation, cortical organization of 101 DS and 80 non-DS individuals; ultrastructural studies were also performed on selective cases (five DS and five non-DS). The OFC was plotted on Nellhause curves and showed microcranium after mid-infancy in most cases. Twenty percent of DS children had an OFC in the lower normal range. The brain shape in DS newborn infants was the same as in non-DS infants, but after 3-5 months of age in DS infants the antero-posterior diameter was found to be shorter than in non-DS infants. Narrowness of the superior temporal gyrus was noted in 34 of 101 (33%) of DS brains. Microscopic examination showed myelination delay in 22.5% DS and only in 6.8% non-DS children. Morphometric studies in DS cases from birth showed fewer neurons (20-50% less), lower neuronal densities, and neuronal distribution, especially of cortical layers II and IV. Ultrastructurally in DS, the synaptic density, synaptic length, and contact zones were found to be abnormal. The retardation of brain growth, maturation…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cerebral cortical hemispheres, cerebellum, and hippocampal formations are significantly reduced in size in people with Down syndrome.
“In particular, the cerebral cortical hemispheres, cerebellum, and hippocampal formations are significantly reduced in size (Wisniewski, 1990; Golden and Hyman, 1994; Kesslak et al., 1994; Raz et al., 1995; Pinter et al., 2001; Tarui et al., 2020; McCann et al., 2021).”
From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Wisniewski, 1990
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 297
- Authors
- Wisniewski, K. E.
- Affiliations
- New York State Office for People With Developmental Disabilities (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wisniewski, K. E.
- ORCID
- Wisniewski, K. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- S7
- Pages
- 274-281
- ISSN
- 0148-7299 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8628
- OpenAlex
- W2040670434
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 13.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Medical Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
- Keywords
- Down syndrome, head circumference, microcephaly, cortical dysgenesis, neuronal density, synaptic ultrastructure, chromosome 21, developmental delay, brain structure
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Preschool, Down Syndrome, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Myelin Sheath, Neurons, Organ Size, Synapses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review