The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preliminary phenotypic map of chromosome 4p16 based on 4p deletions
Abstract
We have collected and analyzed clinical information from 11 patients with chromosome 4p deletions or rearrangements characterized by various molecular techniques. Comparing the extent of these patients' deletions with their respective clinical presentations led to the proposal of a preliminary phenotypic map of chromosome 4p. This map consists of regions which, when deleted, are associated with specific clinical manifestations. Nonspecific changes such as mental and growth retardation are not localized, and probably result from the deletion of more than one gene or region. The region associated with most of the facial traits considered typical in Wolf‐Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) patients coincides with the currently proposed WHS critical region (WHSCR), but some anomalies commonly seen in WHS appear to map outside of the WHSCR. The observation of clinodactyly in 2 patients with nonoverlapping deletions allows assignment of these defects to at least 2 separate regions in 4p16. These initial observations and attempts at genotype/phenotype correlation lay the groundwork for identifying the genetic basis of these malformations, a common objective of gene mapping efforts and chromosome deletion studies. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS OF DRUG METABOLISM
Meyer, U. A., & Zanger, U. M. (1997) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.37.1.269 · Cited by 549
Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice
Gardiner, S. J., & Begg, E. J. (2006) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.58.3.6 · Cited by 406
Worldwide distribution of NAT2 diversity: Implications for NAT2 evolutionary history
Sabbagh, A., Langaney, A., Darlu, P., Gérard, N., Krishnamoorthy, R., & Poloni, E. S. (2008) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/1471-2156-9-21 · Cited by 147
PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for N-acetyltransferase 2
McDonagh, E. M., Boukouvala, S., Aklillu, E., Hein, D. W., Altman, R. B., & Klein, T. E. (2014) · Pharmacogenetics and Genomics · doi:10.1097/fpc.0000000000000062 · Cited by 146
Genetic Polymorphism in N-Acetyltransferase (NAT): Population Distribution of NAT1 and NAT2 Activity
Walker, K., Ginsberg, G., Hattis, D., Johns, D. O., Guyton, K. Z., & Sonawane, B. (2009) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937400903158383 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Estabrooks, L. L., Rao, K. W., Driscoll, D. A., Crandall, B. F., Dean, J. C. S., Ikonen, E., Korf, B., & Aylsworth, A. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Medical Genetics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07-17
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 581-586
- ISSN
- 0148-7299 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8628
- OpenAlex
- W1984672882
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preliminary phenotypic map of chromosome 4p16 based on 4p deletions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.1320570413
- The paper
- Estabrooks, L. L., Rao, K. W., Driscoll, D. A., Crandall, B. F., Dean, J. C. S., Ikonen, E., Korf, B., & Aylsworth, A. S. (1995). Preliminary phenotypic map of chromosome 4p16 based on 4p deletions. American Journal of Medical Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.1320570413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.