Cited by 135

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction of normal and expanded CAG repeat sizes influences age at onset of Huntington disease

Djoussé, L., Knowlton, B., Hayden, M., Almqvist, E.W., Brinkman, R., Ross, C., Margolis, R., Rosenblatt, A., Durr, A., Dode, C., Morrison, P.J., Novelletto, A., Frontali, M., Trent, R.J.A., McCusker, E., Gómez‐Tortosa, E., Mayo, D., Jones, R., Zanko, A., Nance, M., Abramson, R., Suchowersky, O., Paulsen, J., Harrison, M., Yang, Q., Cupples, L.A., Gusella, J.F., MacDonald, M.E., Myers, R.H.·2003·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Abstract

Huntington disease (HD) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by the abnormal expansion of CAG repeats in the HD gene on chromosome 4p16.3. Past studies have shown that the size of expanded CAG repeat is inversely associated with age at onset (AO) of HD. It is not known whether the normal Huntington allele size influences the relation between the expanded repeat and AO of HD. Data collected from two independent cohorts were used to test the hypothesis that the unexpanded CAG repeat interacts with the expanded CAG repeat to influence AO of HD. In the New England Huntington Disease Center Without Walls (NEHD) cohort of 221 HD affected persons and in the HD‐MAPS cohort of 533 HD affected persons, we found evidence supporting an interaction between the expanded and unexpanded CAG repeat sizes which influences AO of HD (P = 0.08 and 0.07, respectively). The association was statistically significant when both cohorts were combined (P = 0.012). The estimated heritability of the AO residual was 0.56 after adjustment for normal and expanded repeats and their interaction. An analysis of tertiles of repeats sizes revealed that the effect of the normal allele is seen among persons with large HD repeat sizes (47–83). These findings suggest that an increase in the size of the normal repeat may mitigate the expression of the disease among HD affected persons with large expanded CAG repeats. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.a.20190

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1136/jmg.30.12.1003 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/hmg/8.9.1647 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1212/WNL.46.2.527 · DOI
  4. Brinkman RR, 1997, The likelihood of being affected with Huntington's disease by a particular age, for a specific CAG size, Am J Hum Genet, 60, 1202
  5. Conneally PM, 1984, Huntington disease: Genetics and epidemiology, Am J Hum Genet, 36, 506
  6. 10.1038/81294 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archneur.1987.00520130083023 · DOI
  8. Farrer LA, 1993, The normal Huntington disease (HD) allele, or a closely linked gene, influences age at onset of HD, Am J Hum Genet, 53, 125
  9. Folstein SE, 1989, Huntington's disease: A disorder of families
  10. 10.1038/306234a0 · DOI
  11. Huntington G, 1872, On chorea, Med Surg Rep, 26, 320
  12. 1972, Adv Neurol, 1, 33
  13. 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11404 · DOI
  14. 10.1086/318207 · DOI
  15. 10.1212/WNL.53.6.1330 · DOI
  16. Merritt AD, 1969, Progress in neurogenetics, 645
  17. Myers RH, 1982, Factors related to onset age of Huntington disease, Am J Hum Genet, 34, 481
  18. 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)92587-4 · DOI
  19. Myers RH, 1998, Genetic instabilities and hereditary neurological diseases, 301
  20. 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1981.tb00352.x · DOI
  21. Ranen NG, 1995, Anticipation and instability of IT‐15 (CAG)n repeats in parent–offspring pairs with Huntington's disease, Am J Hum Genet, 57, 593
  22. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-10-03705.2000 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3872 · DOI
  24. SAS Institute, 1997, SAS release 6.12
  25. 10.1136/jnnp.47.12.1283 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/ng0893-393 · DOI
  27. White RF, 1992, Clinical syndromes in adult neuropsychology: The practitioners handbook, 213
  28. 10.1093/hmg/2.9.1467 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Djoussé, L., Knowlton, B., Hayden, M., Almqvist, E. W., Brinkman, R., Ross, C., Margolis, R., Rosenblatt, A., Durr, A., Dode, C., Morrison, P. J., Novelletto, A., Frontali, M., Trent, R. J. A., McCusker, E., Gómez‐Tortosa, E., Mayo, D., Jones, R., Zanko, A., Nance, M., Abramson, R., Suchowersky, O., Paulsen, J., Harrison, M., Yang, Q., Cupples, L. A., Gusella, J. F., MacDonald, M. E., & Myers, R. H.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-04-23
Volume
119A
Issue
3
Pages
279-282
ISSN
  • 1552-4825
  • 1552-4833
Cited by
135
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Huntington's Disease Center Without Walls (PHS Grant) (P50NS016367)
  • The Massachusetts Huntington's Disease Society of America
  • The Coalition for the Cure of HDSA
  • The Jerry and Hazel McDonald Huntington's Disease Research Fund

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review