Cited by 207Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersSchizophrenia research and treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sapap3 and pathological grooming in humans: Results from the OCD collaborative genetics study

Open access

Abstract

SAP 90/PSD95‐a ssociated p rotein (SAPAP) family proteins are post‐synaptic density (PSD) components that interact with other proteins to form a key scaffolding complex at excitatory (glutamatergic) synapses. A recent study found that mice with a deletion of the Sapap3 gene groomed themselves excessively, exhibited increased anxiety‐like behaviors, and had cortico‐striatal synaptic defects, all of which were preventable with lentiviral‐mediated expression of Sapap3 in the striatum; the behavioral abnormalities were also reversible with fluoxetine. In the current study, we sought to determine whether variation within the human Sapap3 gene was associated with grooming disorders (GDs: pathologic nail biting, pathologic skin picking, and/or trichotillomania) and/or obsessive‐compulsive disorder (OCD) in 383 families thoroughly phenotyped for OCD genetic studies. We conducted family‐based association analyses using the FBAT and GenAssoc statistical packages. Thirty‐two percent of the 1,618 participants met criteria for a GD, and 65% met criteria for OCD. Four of six SNPs were nominally associated (P < 0.05) with at least one GD (genotypic relative risks: 1.6–3.3), and all three haplotypes were nominally associated with at least one GD (permuted P < 0.05). None of the SNPs or haplotypes were significantly associated with OCD itself. We conclude that Sapap3 is a promising functional candidate gene for human GDs, though further work is necessary to confirm this preliminary evidence of association. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.b.30897

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. First M, 1996, Users guide for the SCID
  2. Mannuzza S, 1985, Family informant schedule and criteria

Metadata

Authors
Bienvenu, O. J., Wang, Y., Shugart, Y. Y., Welch, J. M., Grados, M. A., Fyer, A. J., Rauch, S. L., McCracken, J. T., Rasmussen, S. A., Murphy, D. L., Cullen, B., Valle, D., Hoehn‐Saric, R., Greenberg, B. D., Pinto, A., Knowles, J. A., Piacentini, J., Pauls, D. L., Liang, K. Y., Willour, V. L., Riddle, M., Samuels, J. F., Feng, G., & Nestadt, G.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Butler Hospital (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Bienvenu, O.J.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-06-15
Volume
150B
Issue
5
Pages
710-720
ISSN
  • 1552-4841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-485X
OpenAlex
W1992922886
Cited by
207
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Council on Graduate Studies, Council of Ontario Universities
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh066284-03, MH50125, MH66284, RR-00052)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH64543, R01MH050214, K23MH064543, MH66284, K23-MH066284, R01MH079487, MH50125)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS042609, NS42609)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR 000 52, M01RR000052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, trichotillomania, skin picking, nail biting, postsynaptic density, candidate genes, single nucleotide polymorphisms, haplotypes, family-based association, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
SAP90-PSD95 Associated Proteins, Adolescent, Child, Cooperative Behavior, DNA Mutational Analysis, Family, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, Hygiene, Male, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review