Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linear clinical progression, independent of age of onset, in Niemann–Pick disease, type C

Open access
Yanjanin, Nicole M., Vélez, Jorge I., Gropman, Andrea, King, Kelly, Bianconi, Simona E., Conley, Sandra K., Brewer, Carmen C., Solomon, Beth, Pavan, William J., Arcos‐Burgos, Mauricio, Patterson, Marc C., Porter, Forbes D.·2010·American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics

Abstract

Niemann–Pick disease, type C is a neurodegenerative, lysosomal storage disorder with a broad clinical spectrum and a variable age of onset. The absence of a universally accepted clinical outcome measure is an impediment to the design of a therapeutic trial for NPC. Thus, we developed a clinical severity scale to characterize and quantify disease progression. Clinical signs and symptoms in nine major (ambulation, cognition, eye movement, fine motor, hearing, memory, seizures, speech, and swallowing) and eight minor (auditory brainstem response, behavior, gelastic cataplexy, hyperreflexia, incontinence, narcolepsy, psychiatric, and respiratory problems) domains were scored. Data were collected from 18 current NPC patients and were extracted from records of 19 patients. Both patient cohorts showed a linear increase in severity scores over time. Cross‐sectional evaluation of current patients showed a linear increase in the severity score. Longitudinal chart review of historical data demonstrated that although age of onset varied significantly, the rate of progression appeared linear, independent of age of onset, and similar in all patients. Combining the data from both cohorts, disease progression could be modeled by the following equation: Ŝ t0+x = Ŝ t0 + 1.87x; where Ŝ t0 is the initial score and Ŝ t0+x is the predicted future score after x years. Our observation that disease progression is similar across patients and independent of age of onset is consistent with a biphasic pathological model for NPC. This scale may prove useful in the characterization of potential biomarkers, and as an outcome measure to monitor disease progression in NPC patients. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajmg.b.30969

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Yanjanin, N. M., Vélez, J. I., Gropman, A., King, K., Bianconi, S. E., Conley, S. K., Brewer, C. C., Solomon, B., Pavan, W. J., Arcos‐Burgos, M., Patterson, M. C., & Porter, F. D.
Venue
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-21
Volume
153B
Issue
1
Pages
132-140
ISSN
  • 1552-4841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-485X
OpenAlex
W2160604070
Cited by
191
References
2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linear clinical progression, independent of age of onset, in Niemann–Pick disease, type C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajmg.b.30969
The paper
Yanjanin, N. M., Vélez, J. I., Gropman, A., King, K., Bianconi, S. E., Conley, S. K., Brewer, C. C., Solomon, B., Pavan, W. J., Arcos‐Burgos, M., Patterson, M. C., & Porter, F. D. (2010). Linear clinical progression, independent of age of onset, in Niemann–Pick disease, type C. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30969

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.