The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Subspecific genetic differences in the saddle‐back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) postcranial skeleton
Abstract
Saddle‐back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) have been differentiated into subspecies based on coat color and facial morphology. Morphology of first‐generation genetic hybrids can provide an understanding of population differences and evolution that may otherwise be difficult to obtain. This study compares postcranial morphology in two hybrids of saddle‐back tamarins (S. f. illigeri × S. f. lagonotus and S. f. illigeri × S. f. leucogenys) to the purebred subspecies. We examine whether postcranial morphology differs between the purebred subspecies and their hybrids, and whether hybrids exhibit heterosis indicative of genetic differences between the parental subspecies. Fifty postcranial dimensions, or traits, were measured on 287 S. fuscicollis skeletons. Measurements were corrected for sex differences and environmental differences (wild‐derived or laboratory‐born). Females were larger than males for most postcranial dimensions, especially in the pelvis. Significant environmental differences were found throughout the postcranial skeleton, with wild‐derived animals generally larger than animals born in the laboratory. Significant heterosis was found for six postcranial traits in the S. f. illigeri × S. f. leucogenys cross, and heterosis was found for 15 postcranial traits in the S. f. illigeri × S. f. lagonotus cross. These results suggest that subspecies differences in skeletal morphology are generally due to genetic rather than environmental differences. The subspecies appear to represent geographic isolates that differ in gene frequencies and directional dominance for skeletal traits. Am. J. Primatol. 54:41–56, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One possible morphometric indicator of dysgenesis in hybrids is trait values below parental trait averages.
“One possible morphometric indicator of dysgenesis in hybrids is trait values below parental trait averages (sensu Kohn et al. 2001; Ackermann et al. 2006).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Kohn et al. 2001
Previous primate studies showing evidence for heterosis in primate hybrids were based on early generation hybrid samples with known pedigrees, which allowed for distinction among different kinds of hybrids.
“Previous primate studies showing evidence for heterosis in primate hybrids were based on early generation hybrid samples with known pedigrees (e.g., Cheverud et al. 1993; Kohn et al. 2001; Ackermann et al. 2006), which allowed for distinction among different kinds of hybrids (e.g., F1 vs backcross).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Kohn et al. 2001
Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is observed in genetically isolated taxa with differences in gene frequencies or dominance deviations and is maximal when different alleles are fixed between taxa.
“Heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is observed in genetically isolated taxa with differences in gene frequencies or dominance deviations and is maximal when different alleles are fixed between taxa (Kohn et al. 2001).”
From Morphological Variation in Wild Marmosets (Callithrix penicillata and C. geoffroyi) and Their Hybrids (2014) · cites this paper as Kohn et al. 2001
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1086/284142 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330490404 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350210102 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350310104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01296967 · DOI
- CroppS.1997.Evolutionary diversification among tamarins (genusSaguinus)(dissertation). St. Louis: Washington University. 233 p.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199901)108:1<65::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- Falconer DS, 1981, Introduction to quantitative genetics
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb56381.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00007890-196911000-00009 · DOI
- Gengozian N, 1971, Medical primatology, 1970, 926
- Gengozian N, 1971, Medical primatology, 1970, 165
- 10.1007/BF02381126 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb03992.x · DOI
- Hershkovitz P, 1977, Living New World monkeys
- 10.1007/BF00300058 · DOI
- 10.1093/sysbio/44.4.515 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajp.1350330402 · DOI
- 10.1159/000156199 · DOI
- Lynch M, 1998, Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330890107 · DOI
- 10.1097/00007890-196911000-00010 · DOI
- Singleton GR, 1983, The effect of social organization on reproductive success and gene flow in colonies of house mice, Mus musculus, Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 12, 49, 10.1007/BF00296932 · DOI · Paper page
- Templeton AR, 1987, Mammalian dispersal patterns, 257
- Turner HN, 1969, Quantitative genetics in sheep breeding
- Wright S, 1932, The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution, Proc Sixth Int Congr Genetics, 1, 356
- 10.1086/280996 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fuzessy, L. F., Silva, I. D. O., Malukiewicz, J., Silva, F. F. R., Pônzio, M. D. C., Boere, V., & Ackermann, R. R. (2014) · Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1007/s11692-014-9284-5 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohn, L. A. P., Langton, L. B., & Cheverud, J. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Primatology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-19
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-56
- ISSN
- 0275-2565
- 1098-2345
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review