Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Energetic costs of bipedal and quadrupedal walking in Japanese macaques.

Nakatsukasa, M., Ogihara, N., Hamada, Y., Goto, Y., Yamada, M., Hirakawa, T., Hirasaki, E.·2004·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

We investigated the energetic costs of quadrupedal and bipedal walking in two Japanese macaques. The subjects were engaged in traditional bipedal performance for years, and are extremely adept bipeds. The experiment was conducted in an airtight chamber with a gas analyzer. The subjects walked quadrupedally and bipedally at fixed velocities (<5 km/hr) on a treadmill in the chamber for 2.5–6 min. We estimated energy consumption from carbon dioxide (CO 2) production. While walking bipedally, energetic expenditure increased by 30% relative to quadrupedalism in one subject, and by 20% in another younger subject. Energetic costs increased linearly with velocity in quadrupedalism and bipedalism, with bipedal/quadrupedal ratios remaining almost constant. Our experiments were relatively short in duration, and thus the observed locomotor costs may include presteady‐state high values. However, there was no difference in experimental duration between bipedal and quadrupedal trials. Thus, the issue of steady state cannot cancel the difference in energetic costs. Furthermore, we observed that switching of locomotor mode (quadrupedalism to bipedalism) during a session resulted in a significant increase of CO 2 production. Taylor and Rowntree ([ 1973] Science 179:186–187) noted that the energetic costs for bipedal and quadrupedal walking were the same in chimpanzees and capuchin monkeys. Although the reason for this inconsistency is not clear, species‐specific differences should be considered regarding bipedal locomotor energetics among nonhuman primates. Extra costs for bipedalism may not be great in these macaques. Indeed, it is known that suspensory locomotion in Ateles consumes 1.3–1.4 times as much energy relative to quadrupedal progression. This excess ratio surpasses the bipedal/quadrupedal energetic ratios in these macaques. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.10352

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terrestrial bipedal walking, although possible by non-human primates for short periods, may be energetically expensive for them.

    “there have been a number of arguments put forward that as such, terrestrial bipedal walking, although possible by these species for short periods of time, may be energetically expensive (Carey and Crompton, 2005; Leonard and Robertson, 2001; Nakatsukasa et al., 2004; Pontzer et al., 2009; Rodman and McHenry, 1980).”

    From The energy costs of wading in water (2014) · cites this paper as Nakatsukasa et al., 2004

  • Human bipedalism has greater walking economy than other primates, including chimpanzees.

    “Metabolic studies indicate that a key advantage of human bipedalism is greater walking economy than in other primates, including our closest living relatives, chimpanzees (Nakatsukasa et al., 2004; Sockol, Raichlen, & Pontzer, 2007).”
  • Human bipedal walking is considerably less expensive than quadrupedal or bipedal walking in other primates.

    “Upright bipedal walking has long been argued to represent an adaptation for greater walking economy (Rodman & McHenry, 1980), as human bipedal walking is considerably less expensive than quadrupedal or bipedal walking in other primates (Nakatsukasa et al., 2004; Sockol et al., 2007).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Hayama S, 1992, Monkey performance: the development of bipedalism in trained Japanese monkeys, Acta Anat Nippon, 67, 169
  2. Hirasaki E, 2002, Kinematics of bipedal locomotion in bipedally‐trained Japanese macaques (monkey performance monkeys), Am J Phys Anthropol, 34, 85
  3. Ishida H, 1991, Origine(s) de la bipédie chez les Hominidés, 9
  4. Iwamoto M, 1985, Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses and human bipedalism, 251
  5. Nakatsukasa M, 2003, Skeletal response to bipedalism in macaques: with emphasis on cortical bone distribution of the femur, Cour Forschungsinst Senckenberg., 243, 35
  6. 10.1159/000156828 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/physzool.50.3.30155721 · DOI
  8. 10.1159/000156333 · DOI
  9. Rose J, 1994, Human walking
  10. Steudel K, 2000, On the move: how and why animals travel in groups, 9
  11. 10.1126/science.179.4069.186 · DOI
  12. Taylor CR, 1982, Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion, J Exp Biol, 97, 1
  13. Yamazaki N, 1985, Primate morphophysiology, locomotor analyses and human bipedalism, 105

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nakatsukasa, M., Ogihara, N., Hamada, Y., Goto, Y., Yamada, M., Hirakawa, T., & Hirasaki, E.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-03
Volume
124
Issue
3
Pages
248-256
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
62
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review