The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A newly developed visual method of sexing the os pubis
Abstract
Preliminary investigation has indicated that the use of the ventral arc, subpubic concavity, and medial aspect of the ischio‐pubic ramus as sexing criteria allows one to sex the os pubis with an accuracy in excess of 95%. The method described here is simple and objective enough to allow the beginning researcher to sex hip bones accurately while requiring the presence of only a small fragment of the bone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The human skeleton in forensic medicine
J.A.S. (1963) · American Journal of Orthodontics · doi:10.1016/0002-9416(63)90175-1 · Cited by 1,646
Sex differences in the pubic bone
WASHBURN, S. L. (1948) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330060210 · Cited by 253
Sex differences in the pubic bone of Bantu and Bushman.
Washburn, S. (1949) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330070308 · Cited by 90
An introduction to physical anthropology (3rd ed.).
Montagu, M. F. A. (1960) · Charles C Thomas Publisher eBooks · doi:10.1037/13364-000 · Cited by 62
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Brothwell O., 1963, Digging Up Bones
- Grant J. C. Boilean, 1965, Grant's Method of Anatomy
- Gray Henry, 1966, Gray's Anatomy
- Hrdlicka Ales, 1952, Practical Anthropometry
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A method for visual determination of sex, using the human hip bone
Brůžek, J. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.10012 · Cited by 1,161
Knee osteoarthritis has doubled in prevalence since the mid-20th century
Wallace, I. J., Worthington, S., Felson, D. T., Jurmain, R. D., Wren, K. T., Maijanen, H., Woods, R. J., & Lieberman, D. E. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1703856114 · Cited by 1,106
Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits
Walker, P. L. (2008) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20776 · Cited by 686
Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements
Spradley, M. K., & Jantz, R. L. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x · Cited by 638
Personal identification in mass disasters
Stewart, T., Institution, S., & Army, U. S. D. O. T. (1970) · doi:10.5479/sil.30678.39088001440254 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Phenice, T. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phenice, T. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1969-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-301
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2164158552
- Semantic Scholar
- 281c320341149edac7921b0c9444bcd54022b35e
- Cited by
- 1,625
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Keywords
- sex determination, hip bone, forensic osteology, visual identification
- MeSH terms
- Female, Hip, Humans, Male, Methods, Pelvimetry, Pelvis, Pubic Bone, Sex Determination Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review