The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth
Abstract
Measurements were taken on the upper and lower molars of 37 species of primates and one tupaiid to assess the relative importance of shearing, crushing and grinding features. Significant correlations were found between pairs of allometrically standardized dimensions which measure the same molar function (shearing, crushing, or grinding). Correlations between pairs of dimensions which do not measure the same function are not significant. Second molar adaptations for shearing, crushing, and grinding, as well as the length of the second lower molar, and the total surface of the post‐canine dentition are negatively allometric with respect to metabolic rate. Species which take different proportions of fruit, leaves, and insects in their diets have different molar structure. Frugivores have small teeth for their adult body size with poorly developed shearing, crushing, and grinding features on their molars. By contrast, leaf‐eating species tend to have large teeth for their adult body size with well developed shearing, crushing, and grinding. The second molars of insectivorous species were found to parallel closely those of leaf‐eating species. The two groups are clearly distinguishable from the former on the basis of body size alone: the smallest living primate leaf‐eater is on order of magnitude larger than the largest living primate insectivore.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics
Jungers, W. L., Falsetti, A. B., & Wall, C. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330380608 · Cited by 759
Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work
Lucas, P. W. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511735011 · Cited by 550
Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history
Kamilar, J. M., & Cooper, N. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0341 · Cited by 522
High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents
Evans, A. R., Wilson, G. P., Fortelius, M., & Jernvall, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05433 · Cited by 408
Interpreting the posture and locomotion ofAustralopithecus afarensis: Where do we stand?
Ward, C. V. (2002) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.10185 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Kay, R. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-09
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-215
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2002381452
- Cited by
- 739
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330430207
- The paper
- Kay, R. F. (1975). The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330430207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.