The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The basicranium of fossil hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory systems
Abstract
This study investigates the use of the basicrania of fossil hominids as a guide to reconstructing their possible upper respiratory systems. As described previlosly (Laitman and Crelin, '76; Laitman et al., '78), the exocranial orientation of the basicrania of extant primates is related to the position of upper respiratory structures such as the larynx and pharynx. These relationships in living primates sugest that the basicranium of fossil hominids may provide an indicator of what their upper respiratory systems were like. Originals and casts of 14 fossil hominids were examied. The marked similarites in overall basicranial form between Sterkfontein 5 and extant pongids indicate that Sterkfontein had an upper respiratory system similar to that of extant great apes. The Classic European Neandertals show a range of basicranial, and thus potential upper respiratory, structure comparable to extant human children between 2 and 11 years of age. Cro‐Magnon, Steinheim, Předmostí, Broken Hill, and the more recent North African hominids, exhibit basicrania much more similar to those of adult or sub‐adult modern humans. Their upper respiratory systems probably did not differ considerably from that of present day adult humans. Our craniometric analysis has shown that it is statistically improbable for the basicrania, and by extrapolation, upper respiratory systems of certain Neandertals to fall within the range of modern adult or sub‐adult humans. There thus appar to be at least two different pathways taken in the evolution of man's upper respiratory system after a common pongid‐like stage exhibited by the australopithecines. One line appears to have terminated with the Clssical Neandertals. The other line, encompassing those hominids with basicrania and upper respiratory structure of more modern appearance, may have given rise to modern man.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Natural language and natural selection
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081061 · Cited by 1,330
The Evolution of Human Speech: Its Anatomical and Neural Bases
Lieberman, P. (2007) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/509092 · Cited by 338
How Could Language Have Evolved?
Bolhuis, J. J., Tattersall, I., Chomsky, N., & Berwick, R. C. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001934 · Cited by 335
Speculations about the selective basis for modern human craniofacial form
Lieberman, D. E. (2008) · Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20154 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Laitman, J. T., Heimbuch, R. C., & Crelin, E. S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1979-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-33
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2016342908
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The basicranium of fossil hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330510103
- The paper
- Laitman, J. T., Heimbuch, R. C., & Crelin, E. S. (1979). The basicranium of fossil hominids as an indicator of their upper respiratory systems. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330510103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.