Mortuary practices at the Krapina Neandertal site
Abstract
It has often been reported that the Krapina Neandertal remains bear incised linear striations which appear to be cutmarks. Here, the plausibility of the striations as cutmarks is tested by comparing them to Mousterian butchery marks on large fauna and to cutmarks on modern human skeletons known to have been defleshed with stone tools. The anatomical location, gross appearance, and frequency of occurrence of the striations on the Krapina material do not resemble Mousterian butchery marks on reindeer. The Krapina striations do closely match authenticated cutmarks on 22 modern human skeletons defleshed with stone tools after partial decomposition, preparatory to secondary burial. Data are presented supporting the hypothesis that the striations on the Krapina Neandertal remains are consistent with postmortem processing of corpses with stone tools, probably in preparation for burial of cleaned bones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neanderthals seem to have had varying attitudes to the burial and treatment of their dead.
“Why then would a hominin species such as the Neanderthals, who seem to have had varying attitudes to the burial and treatment of their dead2260616272, not have an equally complex attitude towards cannibalism?”
From Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic (2017) · cites this paper as [22]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ferna´ndez-Jalvo, Y., Carlos Dı´ez, J., Ca´ceres, I., & Rosell, J. (1999) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1006/jhev.1999.0324 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Neanderthal Cannibalism at Moula-Guercy, Ardèche, France
Defleur, A., White, T., Valensi, P., Slimak, L., & Crégut-Bonnoure, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5437.128 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Saladié, P., & Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-016-9306-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Assessing the calorific significance of episodes of human cannibalism in the Palaeolithic
Cole, J. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44707 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Men, Women, and Children Starving”: Archaeology of the Donner Family Camp
Dixon, K. J., Novak, S. A., Robbins, G., Schablitsky, J. M., Scott, G. R., & Tasa, G. L. (2010) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.3.627 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Russell, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Russell, Mary D.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 381-397
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2138557510
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
- Keywords
- cut marks, funerary practices, lithic artifacts, reindeer, secondary burial, skeletal remains
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Animals, Haplorhini, Bone and Bones, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Fetus, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Mortuary Practice, Yugoslavia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review