The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates
Abstract
A number of factors, including sexual selection, body weight, body‐weight dimorphism, predation, diet, and phylogenetic inertia have been proposed as influences on the evolution of canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. Although these factors are not mutually exclusive, opinions vary as to which is the most important. The role of sexual selection has been questioned because mating system, which should reflect its strength, poorly predicts variation in canine dimorphism, particularly among polygynous species. Kay et al. (1988) demonstrate that a more refined estimate of intermale competition explains a large proportion of the variation in canine dimorphism in platyrrhine primates. We expand their analysis, developing a more generalized measure of intermale competition based on the frequency and intensity of male‐male agonism. We examine the relative influences of predation (inferred by substrate use), female body weight, body‐weight dimorphism, diet, and sexual selection on the evolution of anthropoid canine dimorphism. Intermale competition is very strongly associated with canine dimorphism. Predation also has a marked effect on canine dimorphism, in that savanna‐dwelling species consistently show greater canine dimorphism than other species, all other factors being held equal. Body‐weight dimorphism is also strongly associated with canine dimorphism, though apparently through a common selective basis, rather than through allometric effects. Body weight seems to play only a minor, indirect role in the evolution of canine dimorphism. Diet plays no role. Likewise, we find little evidence that phylogenetic inertia is a constraint on the evolution of canine dimorphism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
(1907) · The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Tokyo · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,892
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,252
The comparative method in evolutionary biology
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-5104 · Cited by 4,931
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Campbell, R. C., Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1970) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2343822 · Cited by 3,955
The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex
Darwin, C. (1871) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.2092 · Cited by 3,227
The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1.
Darwin, C. (1871) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.1037/12293-000 · Cited by 1,912
An introduction to behavioural ecology
Krebs, J. R., & Davies, N. (1981) · Cited by 1,705
Cited by
Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00032325 · Cited by 2,365
Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods
Blomberg, S. P., & Garland, T. (2002) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00472.x · Cited by 893
Evolution of Primate Social Systems
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1023/a:1015520830318 · Cited by 733
Self-citationA COMPARATIVE METHOD FOR STUDYING ADAPTATION TO A RANDOMLY EVOLVING ENVIRONMENT
Hansen, T. F., Pienaar, J., & Orzack, S. H. (2008) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00412.x · Cited by 336
Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates
Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199705)103:1<37::aid-ajpa4>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 461-477
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2157362070
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 36.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.1330870407
- The paper
- Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1992). Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330870407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.