The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metric dental variation of major human populations
Abstract
Mesiodistal and buccolingual crown diameters of all teeth recorded in 72 major human population groups and seven geographic groups were analyzed. The results obtained are fivefold. First, the largest teeth are found among Australians, followed by Melanesians, Micronesians, sub-Saharan Africans, and Native Americans. Philippine Negritos, Jomon/Ainu, and Western Eurasians have small teeth, while East/Southeast Asians and Polynesians are intermediate in overall tooth size. Second, in terms of odontometric shape factors, world extremes are Europeans, aboriginal New World populations, and to a lesser extent, Australians. Third, East/Southeast Asians share similar dental features with sub-Saharan Africans, and fall in the center of the phenetic space occupied by a wide array of samples. Fourth, the patterning of dental variation among major geographic populations is more or less consistent with those obtained from genetic and craniometric data. Fifth, once differences in population size between sub-Saharan Africa, Europe, South/West Asia, Australia, and Far East, and genetic drift are taken into consideration, the pattern of sub-Saharan African distinctiveness becomes more or less comparable to that based on genetic and craniometric data. As such, worldwide patterning of odontometric variation provides an additional avenue in the ongoing investigation of the origin(s) of anatomically modern humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution
Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A. C. (1987) · Nature · doi:10.1038/325031a0 · Cited by 3,100
Craniometric variation among modern human populations
Relethford, J. H. (1994) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330950105 · Cited by 418
The Atapuerca sites and their contribution to the knowledge of human evolution in Europe
Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Martinón‐Torres, M., Carbonell, E., Sarmiento, S., Rosas, A., van der Made, J., & Lozano, M. (2004) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.10130 · Cited by 104
Cited by
The effect of ancient population bottlenecks on human phenotypic variation
Manica, A., Amos, W., Balloux, F., & Hanihara, T. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05951 · Cited by 329
Self-citationFujimoto, A., Kimura, R., Ohashi, J., Omi, K., Yuliwulandari, R., Batubara, L., Mustofa, M. S., Samakkarn, U., Settheetham-Ishida, W., Ishida, T., et al. (2008) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm355 · Cited by 231
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanihara, T., & Ishida, H.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 287-298
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W1975453344
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 70.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metric dental variation of major human populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.20080
- The paper
- Hanihara, T., & Ishida, H. (2005). Metric dental variation of major human populations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20080
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.